Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A sock in the jaw to anyone that calls me a Freeper. (Earpiece-gate)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
chaska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 07:42 PM
Original message
A sock in the jaw to anyone that calls me a Freeper. (Earpiece-gate)
It used to be that singers and speakers always had monitor speakers in front of them so they could hear their own voices. Musicians know what I'm talking about. In a big and possibly noisy room you simply cannot hear your own voice. I'll spare you the technicals. Also, you can't hear the other person's voice.

Nowadays, we're seeing a move to in-ear monitors rather than those big clunky speaker cabinets pointed at the person speaking. These in-ear monitors use a transmitter for wireless operation. At first I thought this was the case.

But now I think it was likely an additional microphone. If you've ever watched a late night talk show you may have seen that the host and guests wear a clip-on mic and have either a desk mic or an overhead mic. This yields a better sound quality than a single microphone.

So, I think this is all likely just tinfoil. It could be what everybody's saying, but not likely.

Geez, I think he would have been a little bit better if he had had help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Did John Kerry have a big bulge on the back of his
suit coat? I don't think so. I haven't heard anything like that about Kerry so, why did JUST the idiot-in-chief have one? Also, at one point in the debate he yelled, "Let me finish!" and NO ONE was talking to him. Can you explain that away too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barney Rocks Donating Member (746 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. hey you know using
the F word is not allowed here! I would never call you a thing like that!

Anyway, you have a good point and I'm glad I read what you have to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmoney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. strapped between his shoulder blades?
Edited on Fri Oct-08-04 07:48 PM by gmoney
not calling you a fr33per, but it would have made a WHOLE lot more sense to have a monitor set-up clipped to his belt.

Also, Kerry would have had one, and when the Kerry campaign was asked about it, they said they hadn't heard anything about it -- if Kerry had used one, it the spokesman would have known.

And if they were using the "dual mic" set up you mention, you would have seen a microphone clipped to his lapel or tie.

Sorry pal, I smell an electronic rat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. Maybe so
But I personally quite enjoy the prospect of them being knocked off their stride to deal with ridiculous questions like this if they manage to get some media legs. It's poetic justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. I just told my husband that various theories were discussed
names were called,but I didn't really care either way.

Because Bush sucks whether he is remote controlled or not. He's just nasty and wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jacksonian Donating Member (699 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. haven't seen any denials or explanations yet
have you? Odd they would let this fester, hmm?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chaska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. I would like nothing better than 2 b proven wrong. Just covering our bases
Some of this, mentioned above, I didn't know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ducks In A Row Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. this is old news and it's boring to boot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
retread Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
9. Assume you are correct. Was it mentioned in the 32 page agreement?
*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC