Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Uh, if there was a threat, why Iraq and not NK or Iran?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 08:13 PM
Original message
Uh, if there was a threat, why Iraq and not NK or Iran?
Bush and Cheney admitted all sorts of things over the last couple of weeks and yet the "unique threat" of Saddam had priority over the REAL threats of Iran and North Korea, both of which have been exacerbated by *'s antics?!?!

I hope those in that audience see through *'s flip-flops and distortions and, damn right, Kerry should get as much chance to rebuttal as Bush (though, typically, republicons get more chances to rebutt a rebuttal)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC