billkurtmeyer
(360 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-08-04 11:08 PM
Original message |
Malloy is on fire with a list of * mistatements!! |
MSgt213
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-08-04 11:09 PM
Response to Original message |
1. How do you increase the wetlands anyway? |
billkurtmeyer
(360 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-08-04 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
MSgt213
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-08-04 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
billkurtmeyer
(360 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-08-04 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. Halliburton - could pull it off! |
cheezus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-08-04 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
8. quit giving landowners subsidizes for turning them into unusued farmland |
|
they fill in ditches so they can take the money that is (normally and justifiablily) used for not using land any given season.
|
Randi_Listener
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-08-04 11:09 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Increase the wetlands by 3 million |
Dudley_DUright
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-08-04 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
6. yup, I asked this question in the real time threads |
|
As a scientist, this drives me up the wall. Numbers without units are (almost always) meaningless. Of course most of what Shrub spouted tonight was meaningless sound and fury signifying nothing (to quote the immortal Bard).
|
mike6640
(621 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-08-04 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
beer piss puddles.
miller time!
|
Dudley_DUright
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-08-04 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
|
They probably fit Bush's definition of acceptable "wetlands".
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:04 AM
Response to Original message |