Ok, someone point me to the link that shows Bush owns a timber co. Plz...

[TryingToWarnYou]

Thanks! I went to Factcheck.org and their search is disabled....

[Ruffhowse]

1. Bernie Ward just talked about it on the radio, Bush does own part of

a timber company, made $84 last year off it. Kerry was right, Bush doesn't even know his own portfolio.

[0rganism]

2. www.needsumwood.com has the dirt

http://www.needsumwood.com/

[CarolynEC]

4. Careful! Someone in another thread warned it's a spyware site

A scam site to infect your computer with all sorts of nasty stuff

[0rganism]

12. Seems it play nasty tricks to Windows/IE users -- I didn't notice anything

I use Mozilla, so such things are well-controlled. But I will do an extra cookieware scan today, just in case.

[drfemoe]

13. lessee then

was there an ulterior motive, then, for whoosh to say "NEED SOME WOOD"?

Is he absolute evil? Or just dumb as a stump?

[Sandpiper]

5. Do Not go to needsumwood.com

It will install spy ware on your computer.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x1018715

[TryingToWarnYou]

15. Um, WRONG.... full of spyware and other nasties.

[Roland99]

3. Click the Archives link off the main page...

it's a couple articles down.

[judy]

6. Here is a link to his 2003 tax return

http://www.opensecrets.org/pfds/pfd2003/N00008072_2003.pdf

Look at page 8, item 9

Limited liability company organized for the purpose of production of trees for commercial sale...etc...

[allemand]

7. Brad Delong quotes factcheck.org:

"President Bush doesn't understand that in 2001 he claimed to be part-owner of a timber-growing business, and so fell under his own definition of "small business owner." Perhaps he should follow Cheney's advice--or what Cheney's advice should have been--to check factcheck.org:

President Bush himself would have qualified as a "small business owner" under the Republican definition, based on his 2001 federal income tax returns. He reported $84 of business income from his part ownership of a timber-growing enterprise. However, 99.99% of Bush's total income came from other sources that year. (Bush also qualified as a "small business owner" in 2000 based on $314 of "business income," but not in 2002 and 2003 when he reported his timber income as "royalties" on a different tax schedule.)"
http://www.j-bradford-delong.net/movable_type/2004-2_archives/000347.html

[freetobegay]

8. Man!

I really need to read the whole thread before clicking on links! :cry:

[Tsiyu]

11. Tell me about it

I didn't think I'd ever get out of there.....

[gmaki]

9. We need to figure out if he still owns it..

If he used to but does not anymore it changes the equation a little.

[drfemoe]

14. not much. same sum. he lies.

[sofa king]

10. Here it is, wood free.

http://www.factcheck.org/article.aspx@DocID=265.html

President Bush himself would have qualified as a "small business owner" under the Republican definition, based on his 2001 federal income tax returns. He reported $84 of business income from his part ownership of a timber-growing enterprise. However, 99.99% of Bush's total income came from other sources that year. (Bush also qualified as a "small business owner" in 2000 based on $314 of "business income," but not in 2002 and 2003 when he reported his timber income as "royalties" on a different tax schedule.)

The President's 2001 tax return, citing $84 in profit from Lone Star Trust. (Adobe .pdf format)

http://www.taxhistory.org/thp/presreturns.nsf/Returns/968A0298DD56761B85256E4400790D0E/$file/bush01.pdf

[mrbill]

16. the scoop on the wood.......

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x2470183