Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Deleted message

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 08:53 AM
Original message
Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
deckerd Donating Member (319 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. Agreed. Excellent post
Edited on Sat Oct-09-04 08:29 PM by deckerd
I personally feel the expectations favored * in the second debate, but it owuld have been difficult to turn that around, because the Kerry camp had ill-advisedly trumpeted weeks ago that Kerry wanted a town-hall format and Bush did not. Better to crow about how good Bush does in a town-hall format, and how he's likely to have a clear win there.

Perhaps more knowledgeable Kerry staffers were actually afraid there was a chance Bush would look good in a town-hall format, what with the Gallup-selected audience.

As for where we are now, we're in good position to pull a decisive win from the post debate spin.

A media win on Debate #2 would really HURT Bush. If it happens, it'll happen on Sunday and Monday. Otherwise, the media will declare it a draw.

It's all up to the talking heads on Sunday and Monday -- will they bury the Internet gossip about Bush's "angry" performance or run with it in hopes of manufacturing a tight race, and creating a neat Gore : Dean : Bush comparison?

Also we can start hammering on the lesser * gaffes of the evening, if the media percieves a larger * slipup they will jump on these, if only to dwell on how Bush COULD have won last night's debate IF HE HADN'T SAID....

* Dred Scott nonsense...
* Group Maternity Homes
* Wrong War, Wrong Place, Wrong Time
* Judges gonna vote for me

* Refusal to admit any mistakes

* "If my opponent were President, Saddam would still be in power, and
the world would be a better place." -- last sentence of his final reply before closing statements -- no correction this time

Also, Kerry's remark about Missouri having more troops in the Coalition
than any nation except Britain is KILLER and should be repeated endlessly.

Kerry has a perfect opportunity to do so now that Bush is about to congratulate Australia for "staying the course".

"Mr. President, Missouri has more troops in Iraq than Australia does, and all of them are in combat. None of Australia's troops are in combat positions. More Missourians have died in Iraq than the entire nation of Australia. As they say in Missouri, SHOW ME you intend to ease the combat burden on American troops. Ask AUSTRALIA to put their troops in combat positions. They are part of the Coalition -- what better opportunity!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC