Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush's incredible shrinking lead

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 05:00 PM
Original message
Bush's incredible shrinking lead
THE ARMCHAIR STRATEGIST
By Dan Payne
October 9, 2004

NATIONAL POLLS show presidential race unchanged. But state polls tell another story.

Very red states. On Los Angeles Times interactive map ( www.latimes.com ), red (Republican) states are really red. George Bush way ahead in 21; average margin: 22 points. He's got 40-point cushion in Utah. (Must've been that Mitt Romney speech at RNC.) Bush has 177 electoral votes, with 270 needed for victory.

John Kerry's big blue states are California, Illinois, and New York, plus eight others in Northeast, good That's 153 electoral votes.

Upswing in swing states. Kerry has to win every tossup state that Al Gore carried four years ago. Kerry's moving up in all of them. In Washington, Kerry's up by 10 points; Oregon, up 10; New Mexico, up 3-11; Minnesota, up 8; Michigan, up 10; New Jersey, up 3-8; Iowa up 7; Wisconsin, up 2 1/2; and Pennsylvania, up by 5-7. If Kerry runs the table on these, he'll have 255 electoral votes. To get to 270, he needs to pocket Ohio (20). <more>

http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2004/10/09/bushs_incredible_shrinking_lead/



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Funny..cnn has bush ahead in
the electoral college.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Well, yes.
They would, wouldn't they? They probably get their numbers from Gallup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes! That Means Kerry Does NOT Need Florda AND Ohio
I'm particularly worried about Florida for obvious reasons, but it may not make any difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveinMD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. we need
one of the two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jasper 91 Donating Member (483 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. It's a good job we don't need both
Not because there aren't more people wanting to vote for Kerry , but because of Jeb and Glenda Hood in Florida and Ken Blackwell in Ohio .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC