Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why hasn't Kerry mentioned Abu Grahib (sp?) during the debate?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
SCRUBDASHRUB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 10:56 PM
Original message
Why hasn't Kerry mentioned Abu Grahib (sp?) during the debate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
knowbody0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. i get the feeling wednesday
will be orgasmic for all of us. he has so much amunition.documented
certifiable damning evidence and reality to shove down puke's face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. Doesn't want undecideds to think he's soft when it
comes to torturing innocent people.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progdonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. because Abu Ghraib was an anomaly...
Edited on Sat Oct-09-04 11:12 PM by progdonkey
...at least, that's what the media wants everyone to believe.

If Kerry were to mention Abu Ghraib, the media whores would spin it as impugning the honor of all soldiers and blaming Bush for things out of his control. Yes, we know that the White House authorized "stressful positions," and issued memos defending Bush's right to torture, etc., but the media hasn't been reporting this as much (usually only when during interviews with Hirsch), so most Americans are probably unaware of the memos and policies. To them, Abu Ghraib is just an unfortunate incident concerning some bad apples; surely, Bush is incompetent, but he wouldn't authorize torture!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pax Argent Donating Member (350 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. Same reason he won't bring up the Admin lying to the UN
and the other international idiocies conducted by this President.

The fact is he doesn't want to state that the US was wrong on a number of fronts because that would leave him in a weaker negotiating position when he becomes president.

It would also cause a major backlash among US voters. Look what happened last time he told the truth about a bullshit war: about half of the US still hasn't forgiven him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peak_Oil Donating Member (666 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. Cause he knows it will continue.

I think it's because that shit will continue under his watch. War is fucked up. War is killing people and blowing shit up. You need to desensitize the troops so they can kill. I've heard stories... but I guess we all have. Some of you might have been there and done that, I don't know.

If we stay at war, that shit's going to keep on happening. I think Kerry knows that. He wouldn't sanction that officially, and would distance himself from it as much as possible, and even send the orders down the line to stay away from it. That doesn't mean it's not going to happen. There's a reason GWB didn't want to join the international criminal court. I'll bet Kerry won't join it either. Our boys and girls could have been hung for the shit they pulled over there. That is NOT good for morale, either here at home or abroad.

There's no other justification for not wanting to join. If you're not at war you have no problems. If you're the victim, you have every reason to join. What's that leave?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soggy Donating Member (222 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-04 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
6. because saying anything bad about our troops
is the kiss of death. we NEED to believe that we are an infallable, moral country. it would be political suicide to pop that bubble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gauguin57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-04 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
7. Awww, he should at least bring it up ... if only to hear Bush pronounce
it 16 different ways ...

Abu-Gah-RUM!
Abu-Gah-REFF!
Abu-Gah-RAPE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC