Gin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-10-04 10:16 AM
Original message |
Maybe Bush and Kerry should take their jackets off before the next |
|
debate to prove there are no hidden devices taped to their backs.
The shot of shrub with the "hump" looks mighty suspicious to me.
|
Catch22Dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-10-04 10:18 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Like I said in another post |
|
Something is there, but a wire ain't it. They have access to tiny wireless receivers. They're not going to strap a toaster to his back in front of a TV audience. You can do a better job of wiring someone with a receiver by shopping at Radio Shack.
My theory: he's wearing a vest, but his handlers don't want to admit it because it will make him look scared and weak.
|
goclark
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-10-04 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. All they need to say is |
|
"Senior government officials have always wore protective devices and communication devices. This is not something new."
Then go for the fear factor: "Since 9 11, the need for high government officials to be equipped with the best security devices is of utmost importance."
Who wouldn't understand that angle?
The problem is that no one seemed to notice Cheney with a hump at the debate. No one seemed to notice any ticks or strange speech patterns with Cheney.
No one has ever, to my knowledge, picked up any strange audio sounds associated with Cheney in his numerous appearances.
It's only Puppet Boy.
Why is that?
It would be far better to take that angle than to keep this going and have the tailor,Georgie of Paris, say that it was a "pucker."
|
J6ash
(20 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-10-04 10:20 AM
Response to Original message |
|
If they can't bring it up or get the guys wanded or some other electronic scrub/scramble, that's just a shame. The townhall was the one where Kerry could have taken his jacket off and rolled up his sleeves. Then Bush would have been stuck.
|
Gin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-10-04 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. Maybe shrub has an extra body part back there...that we never knew about.. |
Liberal Gramma
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-10-04 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. LOL It's his tail. The reptilian wings are |
|
folded against his body, accounting for his "fatter" look.
|
newyawker99
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-10-04 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
J6ash
(20 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-10-04 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
Hey thanks. Hi to you all to . :yourock: illegal codesmilie_remote(':yourock:')
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:15 PM
Response to Original message |