Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

About 50% of Dean's judicial appointees were women

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 12:55 AM
Original message
About 50% of Dean's judicial appointees were women
Women Appointees - Governor Dean appointed more women to positions of leadership during his tenure than any other state. At one point, the percentage of women appointees in his Administration was higher than the percentage of women in the state. Also, about 50% of his judicial appointments were women.

http://www.africanamericansfordean.com/issues/women1.htm

Enough of this crap that Dean doesn't believe in diversity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. How many were Black, Jewish, Muslim
Edited on Mon Jan-12-04 01:10 AM by Rowdyboy
gay? Just appointing women is supposed to give him a free ride?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. He appointed the first openly gay House member in the history of Vermont
that is over 200 years for those who are counting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. I'm sorry to see you attacking Dean on this non-issue
:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:38 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. Well, you know , my candidate has "Republican roots"
Edited on Mon Jan-12-04 01:39 AM by Rowdyboy
as you pointed out this morning, so you can't really trust anything I say.

Sorry, but those few words from you in the thread on ARG numbers ruined my morning today and pretty much set me on my current "attack Dean" mode. It was the very first thing I read on DU this morning. It was not called for, and I expected better from you, just as you expect better from me now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:43 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. My post deserves a respone
you asked for a high profile gay appointee and I supplied one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 03:02 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Sorry DSC, I'm not being rational tonight
Edited on Mon Jan-12-04 03:03 AM by Rowdyboy
I'm being angry. I've worked very hard to try to keep animosity to a minimum and even people I respect ignore that. It seems, the only thing people today respect is attacking. Justified/unjustified it doesn't matter, just hit below the belt as often and as hard as you can. I've refrained from this shit for months but today, several of the people I most respected attacked my candidate cheaply/gratuitously. I've had enough, its time for pay back. Is it counterproductive? Of course! But thats how you play the DU game, isn't it? Slam, slam, gutpunch, slam, slam, KNEE! That seems to be how its done nowadays. I'm simply tring to stay up with the young folks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 03:10 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. Yes,your post deserves a response. I've respected your opinion
ever since I found DU. You have a great sense of humor and I really respect your views. I also like Dean, but I'm experiencing a breakdown of sorts. I've fought for civility and reason for so long, against enormous odds and finally, I've given up. The asswipes finally beat me down and made me join them.

I respect Dean and, if Clark loses, I'll be proud to vote for Dean. Just don't tell anyone else I said it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EXE619K Donating Member (717 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
14. Okay, that's it! I cannot support Dean any further!
Over twelve-years, Gov. Dean has failed to change the demographics of his state by chartering a C-5 Galaxy transport to relocate thousands of colored folk to re-populate his state and change the ethnic diversity of Vermont!


Guess what? I don't give two fucks about "ethnic" composition his state. In my honest opinion, If you think the race issue is the most important thing heading into this election and you feel bothered by Gov. Dean's unfortunate position as a former Governor of a state with little diversity, please, feel free to shop for someone else! And I have the feeling that you've already have made up your mind.

I'm neither White or Black. I'm an Asian by birth.
Race is an issue in this country because PEOPLE MAKE IT SO!

But, that's just my opinion.

By the way, something that's perplexed me for a long time....Why do "white" and "black" populations view us Asians as being "Yellow"?
Last time I was in the shower, I noticed that it's more like "pale-brown".

I never understood that perception....care to elaborate?


DEAN LEADS THE WAY!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shivaji Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
2. With 98% white population in Vermont, Dean was 49 times more
likely to run into qualified and competent white cabinet members than
from the 2% minority. Is Sharpton implying Dean should have appointed
a black person simply for the sake of diversity, regardless of
competency or qualifications? I hope not, but won't hold my breath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyBrandt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yeah, appointing blacks would have been "reverse
discrimination" don't you know? That's what the National Review folks say
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:15 AM
Response to Original message
5. So what?
Edited on Mon Jan-12-04 01:15 AM by in_cog_ni_to
That doesn't excuse the fact that he was in office for what? 5-6 terms and NEVER hired ONE minority. Downright shameful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. He had an Asian-american in his cabinet n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NV1962 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. I've seen references to SIX minority representatives appointed
Either way... Al Sharpton got a nice ride here - don't think any of the other ones would/could have, certainly not to the same extent.

Sounds like a soundbite s*itstorm twisted into the shape of gotcha politics. Anyway, let's see the AA / EO track record of those shouting the hardest about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stickdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:23 AM
Response to Original message
7. See, that doesn't count. Neither do gays. Or Asian Americans.
Edited on Mon Jan-12-04 01:24 AM by stickdog
Only the 1 in 200 blacks or 1 in 150 VT Latinos put into 6 senior cabinet positions count.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. exactly.
and the diversity in Dean's presidential campaign doesn't matter either. Fuck Sharpton for being a race-baiter!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:38 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. certainly not to sharpton they don't
just ask the Korean grocers who got rioted on thanks to his demogaguary and the gays he called fags.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:36 AM
Response to Original message
11. Of course Dean believes in diversity
Edited on Mon Jan-12-04 01:36 AM by depakote_kid
and even the diehard, disingenuous Clark posters know this. The fact is that there a set of people here who will latch onto just about anything (or go histrionic over nothing) to attack Dean. Whether it's simply out of frustration and a need to vent, simple minded gotcha politics or some other motive, who can say?

In any event, it's not persuasive and more often than not has the opposite effect of what's intended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_Jumper_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 03:17 AM
Response to Reply #11
19. Then why didn't he practice diversity in hiring?
Actions speak louder than words...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:56 AM
Response to Original message
16. Not to mention 50% of Dean judicial appointments were women. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 03:34 AM
Response to Original message
20. I'm waiting for allegations that he's a womanizer
How low can we go?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC