MikeG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-11-04 11:17 AM
Original message |
Here's the Dred Scott case. |
|
Edited on Mon Oct-11-04 11:17 AM by MikeG
|
On the Road
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-11-04 11:42 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Looks like the decision was explicitly made based on strict constructionism, and from that point of view may have been correctly decided.
Bush denies (for whatever it's worth) that he would appoint this kind of judge to the court. He then says he would appoint someone with the same basic philosophy.
|
spotbird
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-11-04 11:45 AM
Response to Original message |
|
*'s reference to Dread Scott was a message to the wingnuts that he will appoint judges who will overturn Roe v Wade. It had nothing to do with Dread Scott. Google it for details.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:55 AM
Response to Original message |