Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The race is NOT tied, just like the last debate was NOT a tie.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
TruthIsAll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-04 06:02 PM
Original message
The race is NOT tied, just like the last debate was NOT a tie.
Edited on Mon Oct-11-04 06:42 PM by TruthIsAll
If it's tied at 47, that's Bush's ceiling.
It's Kerry's floor.

The 6% remaining undecided/other will go to Kerry by at least 2-1.
That means he's a winner.

Bush's job approval is at 49.25% (11 poll average).
That's means he's a loser. No one has EVER won the presidency with approval below 50%.

The media is trying their best to keep the illusion alive. The UN Oil for Food Scandal? Piling on Kofi Annan won't cut it. Not when we are still fighting the Bush War for Oil in Iraq.

It's almost a done deal.

On Wednesday, Kerry will close the book on Smirk.

http://www.geocities.com/electionmodel/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-04 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Local radio pundits were trying to spin momentum turn for Bush
Repeating the "Bush was overprepared" talking point.

One guy was fairly honest and said that the first debate was by far the most watched, so any progress by Bush in the later ones might not help.

Another thought that Bush should quote more stats like Kerry does.

Another pointed out that Kerry voted against Bush Sr. and that war (yeah, well, Kerry's change of heart vis a vis the military didn't come into play until about 1997, so I can believe it)

And over the weekend I heard somebody whining about how the questions in the first debate were slanted against Bush.

Gads, it's good to see them on the defensive for once. Just like our excuses and complaints when Kerry seemed to be doing badly, all their complaints are just so much noise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Longhorn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-04 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. "Another thought that Bush should quote more stats like Kerry does."
That made me chuckle! I guess if he's got his wire in place, it's a possibility but I notice he tries to stay away from anything close to math as much as possible! :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FloridaPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-04 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. I seem to remember that when * job approval were around 80%
the number of people who said they would vote for him was around 50%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beyurslf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-04 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. Close elections make better ratings...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-04 07:40 AM
Response to Reply #4
17. They have
bigger fish to fry than ratings, all-important as they normally are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-04 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #4
19. More importantly... close elections...
... require candidates to do more advertising. And so more $$$$ to TV stations.

It's in the networks' and TV stations' financial best interest to make the election appear close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-04 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Compared to the losses
Edited on Tue Oct-12-04 05:54 PM by KCabotDullesMarxIII
that a breaking up of the big media groups, together with the re-enactment of the laws on fairness and the diminution of the media's partisan political clout, all of which will surely ensue, such financial gains now would scarcely register.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wanpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-04 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. It has been difficult...
but I have learned to turn the bs off! I don't watch cable news and local talk radio. The spin and lying was so ridiculous that it was affecting my blood pressure. I feel much better now, although it's still hard and sad to believe that our media has stooped to such utter lows. No longer can they be trusted as they are robots for their big corporate owners. Don't trust them! Just continue the fight and vote on 11/2. I'll be so glad when this is all over.:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyFianna1 Donating Member (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-04 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
6. Actually Harry Truman he had approval ratings of almost 25% in 1948
and we know how that story ended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-04 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. That doesn't sound right.
Proof?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TruthIsAll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-04 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. In that election, they stopped polling much too soon.
And I don't believe HST was ever that low. If he was, he could not have won by 51%-48%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-04 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. I agree about the undecideds.
They don't want to vote for Bush. Kerry just has to convince them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John_H Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-04 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
10. I used to have a quote from one of Chimp's pollsters saying that
rethugs generally need a 4 point lead on election day to overcome the Dem GOTV operation. Wish I could find it, since every KE press person in swing states should be repeating it often in red leaning swing states.Dems need to know that even if we're 3 points down in their state we can win easily if they head to the polls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txindy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-04 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
11. This election is too important to ignore, so I wish
the media would stop trying to make it seem closer than it is. It's not as if we're going to become complacent and stop paying attention! They will not lose ratings because of it. On the contrary, I have reduced my cable news watching because of their obvious bias and poor reporting. Telling the truth might...MIGHT bring me back. Right now, though, I get excellent news from the internet. The SCLM is expendable, as far as I'm concerned. This atttitude of theirs does them no favors. Just MHO, of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prairie populist Donating Member (175 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-04 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
12. No doubt, something funky is going on.
The polls aren't showing it, but even in the Reps' stronghold in the Midwest, people are distancing themselves from their usual party of choice.

I personally know of at least a dozen people in rural (ie extremely Republican) Nebraska who last time voted for either Bush or Nader and this time are voting for Kerry. I don't know of anyone who last time voted for Gore who is switching to Bush this time around.

Also, a University of Nebraska poll released today showed that Lincoln and Lancaster County are heavily favoring Kerry. The rest of the state will probably, reluctantly, go Bush. But with the Electoral College system in place in Nebraska, Kerry should pick up at least one more in his column that nobody is factoring in. And that's just how things are in Nebraska, a place that is about as Red State as you can get.

Nobody is picking up on this polling-wise. Apparently they have already written of certain areas as done-deals and are not getting a feel for the genuine distrust and disgruntlement with the present administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Awsi Dooger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-04 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
13. That 49.25% approval rating is too high for comfort
I really thought it was a point or two lower.

Kerry would win by maybe 2 points if the election were held today, just the opposite of two weeks ago. Six months ago I remember posting there was a 6 point sliding window of possibility, almost like a Price is Right game, between a 4 point Kerry win and 2 points for Bush. The realities of Iraq and the economy and candidate performance will determine where the game ends on November 2.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-04 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #13
18. It wouldn't
be anything like as high. Why do you still believe the polls?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tedoll78 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-04 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
14. Have we ever had an election where one candidate wins all of the debates?
Because we're looking at a scenario where this could very well happen.

If Kerry wins this Wednesday, I'm fairly certain that he'll win the election. The media will be forced to report for the week after this last debate that Kerry won all three debates.. something that'll leave a HUGE impression on voters. Kerry's bounce will be extended for at least another two weeks from now, and then it'll just be up to us to keep him aloft across the finish line.

And it will not only be up to Kerry.. it will be in our hands as well. Whereas the first debate (on a Thursday) only gave the GOP 24 hours to spin before the weekend news cycle, and the second one gave them no real time to spin beforehand (a Friday), this one will give them a full 48 HOURS to turn the crap that Bush lays into a golden egg. We need to be there every step of the way fighting this, rockin' the online polling, writing emails to TV shows, snail mailing newspapers and TV stations, calling into radio programs to share our views, participating in polite conversation.. we will bear a great deal of the weight of this onto our own collective shoulders.

Our track record with the three debates so far suggests that we certainly can do this, but the GOP is really, really scared. They know that if they lose this election, the Supreme Court could be ours for a generation. They know that because of demographic change in this country, this election could signal the beginning of Democratic Electoral College dominance. They're fighting for their political lives, so I fully expect them to throw everything they've got at Kerry. And what could be more humiliating to them.. to die at the hands of a "Massachusetts liberal?!" Ha!

We can do this. We must.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-04 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
15. Oil for food points back to Halliburton
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TruthIsAll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-04 06:58 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Oc. 20: Rumor that Kerry will unload a Bush/Iraq $ scandal
Edited on Tue Oct-12-04 06:58 AM by TruthIsAll
tia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VDHark Donating Member (12 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-04 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. What's this all about?
I thought I heard something about this today... is this OUR October surprise?? Who got the money?? Halliburton?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TruthIsAll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-04 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. I just saw the rumor in a post earlier today on DU. Oct. 20 is the day.
Edited on Tue Oct-12-04 10:16 PM by TruthIsAll
We will just have to wait and see.

Supposedly it involves Cheney, Bush, Halliburton, Sinclair, JADOO
and skimming the Food for Oil Program.

Mike Malloy talked about it tonight on Air America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC