Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Deleted message

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-04 10:26 PM
Original message
Poll question: Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
frank frankly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-04 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. it is really quite revolting
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-04 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. Pete, the Times has been much more fair to Kerry
Their SBVT expose on the connections back to the White House for example.
Their editorials have also been vey favorable to Kerry.
just saying....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-04 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-04 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. don't be surprised if they endorse Bush
i'm prepared for it.

the only reason i can see that they would not do that is because i assume their readers are mostly liberal/democratic types and an outright endorsement of Bush would mean losing readers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PROGRESSIVE1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-04 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. "The Naziton Post" will be running daily hits on John Kerry.
:puke:

To be fair there, the NY Times has been very Pro-Kerry these days and has run many Editorials in his favor. So let's not include the Times with the Post, after the Times was anti-war while the Post was for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frank frankly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-04 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC