Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush wins with this Sinclair Mess

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
nirvana3240 Donating Member (151 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-04 11:09 PM
Original message
Bush wins with this Sinclair Mess
Edited on Tue Oct-12-04 11:32 PM by nirvana3240
This is from TEENAGE ENTHUSIAST at
http://www.teenageenthusiast.blogspot.com

Ok I know it, I think you know it, the polls show it. When the talk is about the issues, Kerry wins. When the talk is of Vietnam scandals, or other frivolous non-sense and coversation is not about real issues, Bush wins. Look at August and early September. When the talk was about swift boats and CBS and not about Iraq or the economy, Kerry's poll numbers sank. Bush's went up.

This Sinclair mess, does just that. It distracts from the news, and it keeps people from concentrating on Iraq and other real-world issues. I am beginning to think that whether or not the "story" airs, Bush will get helped out because we're not talking about the real things that are happening. Could that remotely, possibly, maybe, be Sinclairs underlying motive? Think they know its a bonus?

Just a theory.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nirvana3240 Donating Member (151 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-04 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. hellooooo?
anyone out there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-04 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Nope, you're totally right.
That's exactly what Edwards just said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jab105 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-04 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's late...but, I think you are right...
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LVdem Donating Member (375 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-04 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. I don't agree
I think the public sees through all this "happened 35 years ago" stuff. What else can be said about Kerry's Vietnam service? What will people learn from this Sinclair debacle that they haven't already heard over the past 4 months?

I'm just glad the swiftvetnuts blew their perverbial wad in August and not October.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K8-EEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-04 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. I Have Mixed Feelings
I honestly don't know. In a way I want to flex some muscle and tell the FCC and Sinclair that we will not stand for this abuse of the broadcast airwaves etc.

But then again I hate having the focus off of * and his failed presidency, and I don't want to create any publicity for them.

The clips I have seen have been dull, uninspired same old warmed over BS. NO match for F-9/11

In a way I think the best thing would be to organize MASS house party screenings of F-9/11 on that day! With celebs and the whole nine, take the attention off of that boring show of theirs!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RafterMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-04 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. I disagree
I keep repeating this, but remember how Arnold's poll numbers went up by 10 points when the groping stories came out. People felt the charges were a blatant attempt at media manipulation of the election.

Tap into that sentiment, and Kerry wins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-04 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. Yes I think there's something to this.
I point out to people: What was the news in Aug and early Sep? Friggin Swifties and memogate. Crappy time for us.

Debates: Not just that Kerry is doing better than Bush , but also it's the fact that this FORCES IRAQ into focus. And that doesn't go well on Bush.

So yeah, it does make me wonder whether the Sinclair crap is designed to focus yet again on Vietnam/Swiftie type nonsense to remove news away from Bush crappy debate performance and the fact that Iraq is a debacle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-04 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
8. Great website! I think it's a win/win for Bush at this point.
Edwards did just elude to what you said on Leno though. :hi:

WELCOME TO DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Julien Sorel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-04 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
9. I agree somewhat.
Issues are a strength for the Democrats. However, the reason the Swift Hoax had any legs was the time period -- it happened in the lull in between national conventions. So the media cast about looking for something to stir shit up, and that was it.

Now, there are only a few weeks until the election, and we have the debate coming up, the post-debate spinning, then the huge push until voting day. The media will have plenty of crap to sling between now and then, so there isn't as big a vacuum to fill with nonsense. I think a bigger stink has been made about this Sinclair thing than it would have made on its own, in fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-04 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
10. no, Sinclair is our issue
we can't do anything about Iraq now--but we must express ourselves about the erosion of our democracy here at home, or lose the opportunity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nirvana3240 Donating Member (151 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-04 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. look at it this way...
Edited on Wed Oct-13-04 12:07 AM by nirvana3240
you see though, What would have a bigger effect on swing voters?

Iraq, where our sons and daughters are getting killed and it is absolute chaos
-OR-
Sinclair, A few rich guys showing some worthless propaganda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-04 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. Look at it this way--
if sinclair (and their ilk) decide not to say anything about our kids getting killed in Iraq, very few people will even think about it. If they say it's improving and freedom is on th march, people will believe them and not worry about our soldiers.

It's what they show that counts, not what really happens. Sad but true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bleacher Creature Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-04 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
12. I have to agree
They knew the firestorm this would produce. It was calculated and intentional. I'm not saying we should have ignored it, but it's getting WAY more attention than it would have before we got up in arms.

At the same time, it's such a threat to our democracy that you just can't let it go unanswered.

I just don't know the answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nirvana3240 Donating Member (151 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-04 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. yes
yes, there in lies the dilemmma
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-04 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
14. It's a mixed bag
It makes Sinclair and the rethugs in general look like scum.

But it's also free advertising for a Kerry hit piece most people would have never known about otherwise and gives the media the chance to bring up all the Vietnam shit again.

I don't know.

:shrug:

I just want their charter revoked and fines all over the fucking place at the end of the day!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BUSHOUT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-04 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
15. "Ok I know it, I think you know it, the polls show it." F#UCK OFF TROLL!
Kerry is winning with or without Sinclair.

You know it, I know it, and the polls show it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gatorboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-04 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
16. Well, you can forget the FCC doing anything.
They're working on the important things like fining Janet Jackson's boobies or giving penalties to Fox for showing scenes from bachelor and bachelorette parties.

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20041013/D85M8GM82.html

I mean, do they really have time to look at this Sinclair thing when they have scenes of brief nudity they have to stay on top of?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nostalgicaboutmyfutr Donating Member (991 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-04 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
18. October Surprise
this is part of the october surprise(s)...expect more

we have only a finite amount of time to get kerry's message across, and this crap is wasting our time debating it and voters time to learn more about Kerry.

this post is so true

and several weeks from now if bush wins you all will spend spend countless hours compalining that:

'we should have done more'
'we should have picked up the phone at the phone bank'
'we should have spent less time posting and more time doing'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-04 12:43 AM
Response to Original message
19. SINclair
I haven't kept up with this whole 90 minute attack bash that Sinclair is doing.. but I do have just one question-

I know that a complaint was filed to the FCC, but will there be a hearing of some sort with them?

Or is the show going on regardless? :(

If there will be a hearing, is there even a slight chance they won't be able to go ahead with this?

Thanks for any clarification.. I'm so confused! :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nirvana3240 Donating Member (151 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-04 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. idk
I dont know what the exact process is....but I dont think the FCC thing will go anywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AVID Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-04 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
21. I agree
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC