Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

O'Neil Revelations

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
RogueTrooper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 10:34 AM
Original message
Poll question: O'Neil Revelations
Do you think the former Secretary O'Neil's revelations will help Dean in the run-up to the Iowa caucuses?

Some Quotes...

"From the beginning there was a conviction that Saddam was a bad person and that he needed to go. It was all about finding a way to do it."

"On the 23 months I was there, I never saw anthing I would characterize as evidence of WMD"


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
vi5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. At what point will it register that the vast majority of voters...
Will NOT be choosing either a candidate or a president based on the Iraq War? I know plenty of people who disagree with the Iraq war, for whom it is one of MANY issues they are taking into consideration. I also know people who completely oppose the Iraq war but who plan on voting for Bush no matter what.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RogueTrooper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. It is less about the war itself
than it is an administration lying about the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vi5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Whatever angle you want to put on it......
The fact is that the general voting populations sees the war (or the administrations handling of it) as one issue among many. There are plenty of people out there who don't like the war and think that the bush admin bungled this one but are perfectly willing to give the benefit of the doubt for any number of other reasons. Ditto dem voters and their particular candidates.

People who are using the war or any sub-issue of the war are already divided into camps. I don't know anyone on the fence about this.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. Dean's Candidacy Made It All About The RESOLUTION
Who voted for it and who did not.

Those who did were labelled by Dean as Bushlite... to heck with the rest of their Liberal careers.

And yet last night Dean says "It's not who voted for what Resolution". VERY Bush-like.

That is what the PNAC'ers and Neo-Cons do... they put their intentions out there and when attention is drawn to it they dismiss the information as insignificant and you as a crank for pointing it out.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sly Kal Donating Member (248 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. It is the lie about the War
That is what matters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. Clark has been saying the same thing
That getting Saddam was always the admin's intent. It will help all who have been saying it. Might hurt those who support the invasion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goldmund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I agree.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CMT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. but Clark isn't competing in Iowa
I think Dean should hammer away for the next week on this issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack_Dawson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Clark - Ahead of the Curve per Usual
Edited on Mon Jan-12-04 10:46 AM by Jack_Dawson
But we welcome Bush Bashing anytime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
6. yes, but people can't have that
They would rather let Bush slide and make the big story about what a big racist Dean is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. I don't think Dean's racist, just a bad representative for the party
he's got too many "holes in that resume to plug" after all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RogueTrooper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. I think you have posted that reply on the wrong thread, mate
this thread is about O'Neils comments and how they could affect Dean's postion in Iowa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lib 4 all Donating Member (209 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
13. O'neil is kind of a turd, he doesn't command respect or authority
and no one is taking him very seriously. I can't see this story lasting for more than a few days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w13rd0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. 19,000 pages of documentation...
...O'Neill can be as much of a turd as he wants to be. He's not the only source for this, and this isn't the first time this has come to light. But people have been handing out 19,000 pages of documentation backing up their claims. If it goes nowhere in the "mass media", we'll know for DAMN certain, as if we didn't already, that the media serves a master, and that master is not the people of the United States, or their interests. What becomes of the enablers? 3,000 people, 500 soldiers, thousands of dead Iraqis...for LIES!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lib 4 all Donating Member (209 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. that may well all be true
but it looks like sour grapes from someone who was fired in a very public and humiliating way trying to exact revenge. Vindictiveness never goes over well with the public, and that is how people are viewing it right now - those who are even paying attention (football playoffs obscured his 60 Minutes interview by over 3:1).
This may change as the documents become public, but for right now, that's just my take on where it's going.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
lib 4 all Donating Member (209 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. I'm just trying to say don't get your hopes up
just like the CIA leak. It didn't go anywhere.

If Colin Powell came out and said what O'neill is saying then people would pay attention. But O'neill is a non-entity as far as the public is concerned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iowapeacechief Donating Member (331 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
14. I voted "Other"...
...because I think O'Neil helped all Democrats, those who gave Bush the benefit of the doubt and those who saw through him all along. I think this can help boost the turnout at the Iowa caucuses. That's a plus for all of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RogueTrooper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
19. Kick
Edited on Mon Jan-12-04 11:54 AM by RogueTrooper
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ozone_man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
20. Certainly it will help Dean.
Especially in the Democratic primaries. Democrats are not as blinded by the media as Bush Republicans are. Many will see that O'Neil is telling the truth and that will support Dean's arguments that there was no justification for the war. It will also have a detrimental effect on those that voted for the IWR, since they should have known better that the intelligence was insufficient, no Al-Queda connection, etc..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
21. Other: it helps EVERYBODY except *
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC