Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bob Schieffer biased?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Ninga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-04 03:05 PM
Original message
Bob Schieffer biased?
Below taken from today's Daily Howler. www.dailyhowler.com
The Daily Howler is a must read each day.

-snip-
The moderator of tonight’s debate is a long-time, close friend of one of the candidates. But guess what? Press and pundits aren’t telling you that. But somewhere, some pundit will watch the session, and he’ll run and proclaim it: Liberal bias!! If George Will provided the liberal bias last week, why can’t Bush’s friend do so too?

FAVORABLE TREATMENT: Let’s remember what Schieffer told Kurtz about his close personal friendship with Bush:

KURTZ (1/13/03): During the ’90s, Schieffer also struck up a friendship with George W. Bush when his brother Tom—now the U.S. ambassador to Australia—became partners with the future president in the Texas Rangers. Bob and W. went to ball games together, played golf, attended spring training. “He’s a great guy—that doesn’t mean I agree with him,” says Schieffer, adding that the situation became “a little awkward” when Bush ran for the White House but that he’s never gotten favorable treatment.
That last claim is baldly inaccurate, and screams for a bit of correction. During Campaign 2000, Schieffer did, on several occasions, make notably odd remarks about Bush and Gore. We wouldn’t suggest that this was deliberate. But the record is hard to ignore.
Is Bob Schieffer driven by liberal bias? In July 2000, he and his Face the Nation co-host, Gloria Borger, appeared together on the cable show, Russert. Their discussion of Bush’s visit to Bob Jones University was one of the oddest of the campaign. Sorry—no one could seriously think that these remarks were made in good faith—unless the pair were gripped by a pro-Bush bias so deep that it somehow surpassed all understanding.

Meanwhile, Schieffer’s hostility toward Gore became plain in a remarkable radio session last year. Yes, the Texas-lovin’ buddy-of-Bush had offered odd remarks about Candidate Gore as early as June 1999 (see THE DAILY HOWLER, 7/23/99). But in December 2003, his remarks about Gore on a DC radio program went about as far afield as any we have ever heard a network anchor make. His statements were nasty and absurdly gratuitous—and they were blatantly, baldly inaccurate (see THE DAILY HOWLER, 12/13/03). Let’s say it again—we can’t think of another time when a broadcaster of Schieffer’s stature made so absurd, inaccurate and nasty a statement. Go ahead and reread those remarks. See if you are able to spot the Texan’s rank liberal bias.

We assume that Schieffer will do a good job tonight. But Schieffer is a long-time friend of Bush—and yes, he has played dumb for Bush in the past. Press and pundits all know not to tell you about the gentleman’s close ties to Bush. But don’t worry! Somewhere, some scribes will watch Schieffer tonight and he’ll recite holy words—Liberal bias!

-snip-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-04 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. I've always found Bob Schiefer to be a pretty fair journalist
Like last week we had all those posts about Charles Gibson being biased against Kerry, but he did pretty well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ninga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-04 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Read what the Howler had to say about Gore.
And then take a bit of time to check out the Howler's archives, especially the ones he cites in his posts.

Then we can talk about how "fair" Schieffer is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-04 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Why don't I just wait until the debate
and I'll judge it there. If he is biased I'll eat my words that I've always found him to be a competent and fair reporter (which I have). I have found him as fair as Dan Rather who apparently owns a ranch with Cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CAcyclist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-04 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. now that you mention that
I was thinking at the time that Charles Gibson was just more interested in Kerry's answer to the question than he was in Bush's - sort of like when I've been in contests where the judge singles out the person he/she would like to award first place to so that the judge can prove to him/herself and everyone watching that this is indeed the best choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newsguyatl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-04 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. i was also personal witness to schieffer
Edited on Wed Oct-13-04 03:08 PM by newsguyatl
snubbing michael moore at the convention in boston.

i was about 2 feet from moore when schieffer walked by... moore stopped and went over to shake his hand and schieffer barely stopped.

you could tell he didn't want to be anywhere near him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoveTurnedHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-04 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. He's Totally Biased
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-04 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. Well, look at it this way...
if the moderator played golf and was a pretty close friend of Kerry, and his brother was a business partner of Kerry and was appointed by Kerry to a nice post....the entire media would be screaming about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ninga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-04 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. That's the whole point!
We just keep on getting the short end.....except of course, Nov. 2nd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-04 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. I just have never seen Bob
Edited on Wed Oct-13-04 03:13 PM by BrentTaylor
be bias and I've watched him for many yrs. But maybe they've gotten to him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ninga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-04 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Good grief, one has to do more than "watch" how about
reading?

www.dailyhowler.com


Meanwhile, Schieffer’s hostility toward Gore became plain in a remarkable radio session last year. Yes, the Texas-lovin’ buddy-of-Bush had offered odd remarks about Candidate Gore as early as June 1999 (see THE DAILY HOWLER, 7/23/99). But in December 2003, his remarks about Gore on a DC radio program went about as far afield as any we have ever heard a network anchor make. His statements were nasty and absurdly gratuitous—and they were blatantly, baldly inaccurate (see THE DAILY HOWLER, 12/13/03). Let’s say it again—we can’t think of another time when a broadcaster of Schieffer’s stature made so absurd, inaccurate and nasty a statement. Go ahead and reread those remarks. See if you are able to spot the Texan’s rank liberal bias.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ninga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-04 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Do not be fooled by his good 'ole boy
Texas drawl and his kind face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-04 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Well blame the weak Dems
for agreeing to let him moderate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-04 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
13. I've seen the knee jerk conservative side of him. Old fart stuff.
I do think he loves a story though, no matter who gets 'Gored'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulfcoastliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-04 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
14. This is disgusting. Daily Howler = truth about media...
Schieffer is biased to Bush* big time, no question. Too bad the entire media including Paul Begala now on Crossfire choose to ignore this. Where is the outrage?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-04 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
15. Well Blame the Dems
for not fighting to keep him from being a moderator. I'm tired of hearing this crap now when its too late for there to be a change. Why didn't this shit come out when they had time to make a change
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC