johnnie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-13-04 09:02 PM
Original message |
I think shrub just fucked his anti-abortion supporters |
|
Kind of dodging the question I would say.
|
no_hypocrisy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-13-04 09:03 PM
Response to Original message |
1. No he didn't. He just lied, that's all. |
librechik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-13-04 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. They'll understand--he gave them the secret eye signal! |
|
Edited on Wed Oct-13-04 09:04 PM by librechik
Blink blink
|
RockaFowler
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-13-04 09:03 PM
Response to Original message |
|
??????????????????????????
|
Eric J in MN
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-13-04 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. Bush is claiming he might appoint pro-choice judges someday (nt) |
demothinker
(193 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-13-04 09:06 PM
Original message |
It's making how someone will vote on an issue a test for the position n/t |
gmoney
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-13-04 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. literally, it's a chemical test |
|
using a specially treated piece of paper, if you dip it in an acidic liquid, it will turn one color, or in a "base" liquid, it will turn another, or if it's a neutral liquid (water) it won't change color
euphemistically, it's a political term for whether someone goes one way or another on a political position
Sort of like the "global test"
|
jmowreader
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-13-04 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
7. A political litmus test... |
|
is using one issue, to the possible exclusion of all others, as the go/no go determinant of a candidate.
Say Kerry uses abortion as his litmus test for selecting an attorney general. AG candidate Jones believes abortion should be left to the states, so Kerry ignores the fact that AGC Jones supports execution for marijuana users and believes child porn should be decriminalized.
|
DemBones DemBones
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-13-04 09:15 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Do you realize that, like Reagan, he has never been able to |
|
"spare the time" to address the thousands of pro-lifers who ahow up in Washington every January to protest abortion? Both of those "pro-life" Republicans basically phoned in their "support." (To be technically correct, I think they sent videos, may be doing live feeds now.)
It should be obvious to anyone that a pResident who actually cared about abortion would attend the big DC march. There's never been a good reason why Bush* couldn't attend.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:17 PM
Response to Original message |