Anybody else find the debate actually pretty boring?

[liberalpragmatist]

Don't get me wrong - I watched the whole thing and I thought Kerry did a great job. But at the other 3 debates, I was quite engaged with it - this one I could feel my attention waning and looked at my watch a lot.

I can't be the only one, can I?

[El Supremo]

1. Yes.

Three debates this year was one too many. It gave Bush a chance to do better. But I'd bet that with the LCS games on that a lot fewer people watched.

[ramapo]

2. SOS

Basically the same ole shit...except with more smirking

[SheWhoMustBeObeyed]

3. Yes, and I blame it on Schieffer

Terrible questions, no new angles that elicited new responses, and dumb touchy-feely, this-will-appeal-to-the-wimmenfolk questions about faith and wives and so on. Sheesh.

I'd rather have heard Barbara Walters ask them if they were trees, what kind they'd be.

[bloom]

4. Yes - I was thinking I was glad it was the last one.

I liked the one with the audience questions.

[theoceansnerves]

5. it was VERY boring

and really, it was all the moderator's fault. absolutely stupid inane questions throughout, there were times when it looked like kerry (and maybe a couple times with bush?) wanted to respond to each other but schiffer was "next question!"

[delete_bush]

6. Yep, too close to last Friday's debate,

and the podium style vs. debate #2 where they could move around made it seem rather stuffy. Plus domestic policy the second time around is not as exciting as foreign policy in a time of 'war'.