Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wish to hell Kerry had addressed the "Massachusetts Liberal" crack

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
PlanetBev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 12:07 AM
Original message
Wish to hell Kerry had addressed the "Massachusetts Liberal" crack
He could have pointed out that cheap cracks like this is what divides this country. That the president is president of all 50 states, not 49. He could have reminded Bush that Massachusetts was one of the fist states and without Massachusetts patriots fighing the Revolutionary War, we might still be a monarchy. And, that the Boston Tea Party took place in Boston, not in Crawford, Texas.

And one more thing, Mr. President. If you look up the word liberal in the dictionary, it's defined as tolerant. If you are against liberalism, you must be intolerant.

Although I think this "liberal" smear has finally run out of gas, I am still waiting after all these years for someone to step up to the plate and take it on.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. Why?
Kerry's plan was to out-class the fool in the ill-fitting suit. I think he did that very well each time.

Bush smirked, he made snide remarks and wisecracks, and pulled out the snarky retorts. Kerry, at the most, smiled indulgently.

Kerry looked like a President. Bush looked like rush-week freshman who got his frat spanking on the wrong end.

--bkl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
2. Those cracks were almost as lame and desparate as *'s "jokes"
Particularly when bush tried to repeat that kerry's out of the mainstream, despite the fact that every national poll has him running around 45% or higher.

I thought Kerry handled them well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoyGBiv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
3. I understand your sentiment ...

But, it's a loser position to take.

Remember Michael Dukakis. He tried to tackle the "Massachusetts Liberal" label head-on, and no matter how articulate, and correct, he was, his words died on the vine while his polls numbers crashed.

Kerry has stayed away from it, not even really acknowledging it. It's better political strategy, no matter how annoying it might be.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dees Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
4. If liberal means
Edited on Thu Oct-14-04 12:27 AM by Dees
Believing in Social Security, Medicare, genuine war on poverty, public education, environmental controls, energy conservation and research, support for working men and women, support collective bargaining, real support for small business, college option for all,
fair taxation, regulation of corporations, health care access for all, energy independence, honoring the Constitution, freedom of religion and speech, zero tolerance for racism and discrimination, using war as an absolute last resort, being truthful to the American public, closing the wealth gap and job creation....by all means call me liberal. Hear me John?

Oh yes...being fiscally reponsible
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
secular_warrior Donating Member (705 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. Exactly. Modern Liberalism is a very mainstream, center-left ideology
that bares little resemblence to the utopian liberalism of McGovern or even Dukakis.

Modern liberalism (I'm not talking about the DLC, which is center-right) is very responsible and concerned with results as much as it with "the dream".

Today, most Democrats consider themselves moderate liberals. By calling ourselves "moderates" it sounds weak, as though we're embarrased of ourselves or of other members in our party.

We need to take back the word so that it applies to the moderate liberals and lefties alike. Using one label is what conservatives did, even though they range from moderate to far right. Using one label helps build party unity and strength. We will never escape the label, nor should we want to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pmbryant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
5. It's an extremely weak attack that is best ignored
Extremely few people will be swayed by the "Massachusetts liberal" remark, especially in a face-to-face debate like this, where they can see and hear the real person in front of them.

Kerry was right to ignore that and make his points on his own, without being defensive.

Peter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheflow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
6. Bush is a "New England-ist"
who deinies his own family history.

Dubya's whole family comes from that region, who is he kidding? Grampa Prescott Bush was a Connecticut Senator, Dubya spent his youthful summers on the shores of Maine, attended Harvard in Boston and went to Yale in Connecticut with Daddy's and Grandaddy's help.

At least Kerry got into Yale and the Federal government by his own efforts and without denying his family history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsUnderstood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
7. I came into the topic to disagree
But you make some good points.

Reminds me of COWARD OF THE COUNTY where the song says "please dont think I'm weak I didn't turn the other cheek--sometimes you gotta fight when you're a Dem. . ."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
8. Yes, would have been good had he stood up for the honor of that
great state with righteous indignation. JK did great but this was an opportunity missed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrFunkenstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
9. Schieffer Did By Asking About The "Divider" Question
The liberal thing fell on its face and made Bush look petty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
secular_warrior Donating Member (705 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
10. I was very disappointed he didn't either
We need to take back the word and stand up for what we are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC