Freepers attack Andrew Sullivan, show their true colors

[Proud2BAmurkin]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1244549/posts

To: watsonfellow
He's doing what all dogs do - sphincter chasing.

9 posted on 10/13/2004 9:59:56 PM PDT by JoJo Gunn (Help control the Leftist population - have them spayed or neutered.©)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse >

To: watsonfellow
Andrew Sullivan is a sexually frustrated fudgepacker.

12 posted on 10/13/2004 10:02:14 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (Real gun control is - all shots inside the ten ring)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse >

[Fenris]

1. Man, I had no idea Jo Jo Gunn was a Freeper.

;)

[KharmaTrain]

8. Jo Jo Gunne Was A 70's Band,Too

And Rosebud was a sled...and looks like Mr. Sullivan is all alone with no friends...deal with the devil and pay the price.

[rumguy]

2. Freepers only show their perverted, disgusting side

Freepers are obsessed with anything rectal/anal related - they are fuckin' wierdos...

[sofa king]

5. Yeah, not like us.

Did you hear Bill O'Reilly uses a vibrator on himself?

[allalone]

9. yeah what's that about

early toilet training too rough?

[obiwan]

13. This is no "side"...

It's the whole package. Freepers are one dimensional.

[bluestateguy]

3. Sullivan is anti-Bush, but will he vote for Kerry?

He pissed me off so much during the Iraq war that I stopped reading his blog.

[sonicx]

7. he's not voting for Kerry, i don't think.

[feistydem]

4. I thought we already knew their "true colors"?

black hearts

[mitchum]

6. Well, I attack Andrew Sullivan, but for different reasons

I'm certainly not rushing to that tea-swilling shill's defense now just because of FR homophobes.
Andy, when you lie down with dogs...

[bacchant]

10. Ha, I love the copyright symbol after JoJo's dumb-ass slogan. eom

[Steelangel]

11. Haha, their retarded comments made me laugh so hard

[GimmeDANEger]

12. Adrew's comments on the Mary Cheney situation could be used as ammo..

against the repugs.



SOMETHING ABOUT MARY: I keep getting emails asserting that Kerry's mentioning of Mary Cheney is somehow offensive or gratuitous or a "low blow". Huh? Mary Cheney is out of the closet and a member, with her partner, of the vice-president's family. That's a public fact. No one's privacy is being invaded by mentioning this. When Kerry cites Bush's wife or daughters, no one says it's a "low blow." The double standards are entirely a function of people's lingering prejudice against gay people. And by mentioning it, Kerry showed something important. This issue is not an abstract one. It's a concrete, human and real one. It affects many families, and Bush has decided to use this cynically as a divisive weapon in an election campaign. He deserves to be held to account for this - and how much more effective than showing a real person whose relationship and dignity he has attacked and minimized? Does this makes Bush's base uncomfortable? Well, good. It's about time they were made uncomfortable in their acquiescence to discrimination. Does it make Bush uncomfortable? Even better. His decision to bar gay couples from having any protections for their relationships in the constitution is not just a direct attack on the family member of the vice-president. It's an attack on all families with gay members - and on the family as an institution. That's a central issue in this campaign, a key indictment of Bush's record and more than relevant to any debate. For four years, this president has tried to make gay people invisible, to avoid any mention of us, to pretend we don't exist. Well, we do. Right in front of him.

http://www.andrewsullivan.com/


I really dislike the guy, but he really has a point and if it gets out there it may sanatize this whole hateful situation.

[George_S]

14. I would like to thank freerepublic

Ann Coulter, the Swift Boat Liars and now SBG for making me active this election year and demonstrating how important it is to vote.