Take part in CNN "Pundits Scorecard"...score 'em A - F on two factors.

[BUSHOUT]

go here

GWB content/delivery = C/C

Kerry content/delivery = B+/B+

[Roland99]

1. How do you rate them? I don't see any options.

[qnr]

2. bottom of the scorecard

you select your choices in all four categories and then submit (I think) in the first column

[Kire]

3. here

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/special/president/debates/press.pundits/


BUSHOUT linked to the results page, above is the link to where you can vote

[Roland99]

6. Thanks...that one worked.

[qnr]

9. Yup, didn't notice since I'd already voted

[BUSHOUT]

5. SORRY! Fixed link now.......

[Florida_Geek]

7. use this link

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/special/president/debates/press.pundits/

[freetobegay]

4. Done!

[BUSHOUT]

8. That Carlos Watson is a lying POS! n/t

[high density]

10. Bob Novak actually gave Kerry a "C" for content?

Wow, that's amazing.

[LynnTheDem]

11. done

bush c

bush c

Kerry B+

Kerry B+

Total: 231695 user votes C C B+ B+

[0rganism]

12. What the hell is Carlos Watson's problem?

He can't just give a single fucking grade in any category, he has to give TWO. Does that make his opinion twice as useful? And then, after giving them all a variant of "B" TWICE, he has this to say:

"Solid performance by each candidate, but neither did enough to lay out a compelling agenda on jobs. Nor did either offer a compelling phrase or an especially memorable moment."

So basically he didn't watch the debate and doesn't know his shit and is horribly indecisive, is what he's saying.

[BUSHOUT]

13. He's a lying POS! n/t