cheezus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-14-04 12:34 AM
Original message |
was it just me, or did kerry get screwed out of followup time? |
|
maybe i just wasn't paying enough attention, but
1) bush just TOOK an extra 30 seconds whenever he felt like it
2) it seemed like many of the questions went kerry 2min - bush 90sec - no kerry30sec followup, just right to the next question.
anyone else notice this?
|
Gloria
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-14-04 12:35 AM
Response to Original message |
1. I kept wondering about missing followups--toward the end esp. it |
|
seemed like both answered and that was it........
|
JI7
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-14-04 12:36 AM
Response to Original message |
2. yes, that's where the debates had been the most unfair |
|
the chimp got to respond anytime it wanted to. but anytime Kerry signaled he wanted to respond he would not be allowed to.
|
noonriser
(216 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-14-04 12:36 AM
Response to Original message |
|
I said the same thing. He kept skipping his request to follow up and would go with a new question to shrub.
|
feistydem
(994 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-14-04 12:37 AM
Response to Original message |
4. I noticed that too. Kerry was not given the same opportunities to respond. |
|
Even with the moderator favoritism Bush fell on his smirky face!
|
patrice
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-14-04 12:37 AM
Response to Original message |
5. Bush wasn't allowing the moderator to determine whether there would |
|
be more follow up; Kerry was.
i.e. as in SO much, Republicans think the rules are for everyone else; they're right so they get to break the rules.
|
DemBones DemBones
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-14-04 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
9. Yes! The rules apply to Kerry, not to Bush*, in Bush*boy's view. nt |
LynnTheDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-14-04 12:37 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Thu Oct-14-04 12:38 AM by LynnTheDem
Yep he did...and bush three times by my count simply started talking without waiting for the moderator telling him to do so; and it was SUPPOSED to be at the moderator's discretion.
|
oregon_dem1
(92 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-14-04 12:38 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Thu Oct-14-04 12:40 AM by oregon_dem1
There was one point where I could tell that Kerry had something big to say because of his anxious body language and then he raised his hand slightly. I was excited because I was expecting a major smackdown, but he was passed over by the moderator. He took it like a man though. Bush would have had a hissy fit!
|
DemBones DemBones
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-14-04 12:40 AM
Response to Original message |
8. I noticed it, too. Read here tonight that Schieffer's brother |
|
is president ot the Texas Rangers "and the families often golf together."
Silly me, I'd have thought that might disqualify someone from being a moderator.
And of course he never pointed out that Bush* hadn't actually answered the question but had just talked about whatever he felt like talking about. Kerry, OTOH, answers questions and THEN talks about whatever he feels like talking about!)
|
Dees
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-14-04 12:41 AM
Response to Original message |
10. Me too... I thought ol' Bobbin Bob cut |
|
in after Monkeyspit's reponse and told Kerry on to the next question.
|
Stephanie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-14-04 12:43 AM
Response to Original message |
11. He did but it's okay. |
|
Kerry had to prove tonight that he could kick ass with one hand tied behind his back. He had to not just win but conquer and RULE over Bush and that's just what he did. With one hand tied behind his back.
|
cheezus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-14-04 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
12. still, i hope the various cheating comes out |
|
it'll just make it that worse
kerry debated the entire WH communications team tonight, and handed their collective ass to them
|
Vincardog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-14-04 12:46 AM
Response to Original message |
13. Right the Idiot bush got extra 30 second when ever he wanted No so for J |
|
John but John Kerry still slays the idiot Bush.
|
Spiffarino
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-14-04 12:47 AM
Response to Original message |
|
My first post in the debate forum was about that very thing. I think Schieffer gave the Shrub a pass and let him speak out of turn, while ignoring Kerry's requests for a follow-up.
In spite of all that Kerry still cleaned house, especially in the last 45 minutes. It just goes to show who has the sharpest mind. I can hardly wait until he has to negotiate with foreign governments...they won't know what hit 'em.
|
pa28
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-14-04 01:48 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Kerry seemed to be denied follow-ups and had to use his own question time to go back and rebut *'s bizarre mis-statements. I really thought Schieffer would be a fair moderator. It looks like I was wrong.
|
elsiesummers
(723 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-14-04 01:58 AM
Response to Original message |
16. Not just you. It was noticable. |
|
Bush took extra time but Kerry never got extra time. The thirty seconds were all one way.
Just like the vote - Republicans never play by the rules so Democrats have to play better and win bigger!
Was most frustrated at the end - but Kerry covered the extra Bush response in his closing.
Kind of sucks when you are watching while your side is being cheated. Schaffer has always seemed Right Wing to me, though, so not suprised (and my mother has sworn he leans right for some thirty years).
|
snowbear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-14-04 02:04 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Why does Kerry always have to do the closing comments first? Why can't we ever end with Kerry doing them? :freak:
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:25 PM
Response to Original message |