Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did anyone have the feeling * had the questions in advance last night?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 07:20 AM
Original message
Did anyone have the feeling * had the questions in advance last night?
He was about to jump out of his shoes while they were being read. He had answers, which was very suspicious and the only times that he was frankly wrong were in response to Kerry's comments.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
libhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. Don't know, but -
Letterman commented a few nights back, about a lump in the back of Shrubs suit jacket - what the hell is up with that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 07:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. At the first debate he wore an ear piece,
naturally they deny it, but it was obvious.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushwakker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
2. listening on the radio
it sounded like he was reading a script. very weird.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CityHall Donating Member (332 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
4. He seemes to be wired
I think this has gone beyond a conspiracy theory. He was fed facts that he probably wouldn't remember on his own. He had a strage halting delivery on some lines like he was getting points fed to him. He's never before demonstrated any ability to come up with new points while still figuring out how to finish his previous sentence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 07:48 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Hmmm-
Edited on Thu Oct-14-04 07:48 AM by libhill
the cabal behind the puppet are getting awfully bold, or awfully desperate, to be showing their hand in such an obvious way. Call me a tinfoil hatter, a conspiracist, whatever - I've had a feeling for some time now, that Shrub is just to damned stupid to be a credible Chief Executive.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GiovanniC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
5. I Have To Say This
IF Bush was wearing an earpiece, that means he can't even win a debate when he's cheating. How pathetic is that?

Now, if I could answer my own question with a question for a moment, is it almost as pathetic as an oilman who can't even find oil in motherfucking Texas, for Christ's sake?

How about a man intricately connected to big oil companies and foreign nations that control oil, who has the biggest and most powerful job in the biggest and most powerful nation on this planet, and who STILL can't get gas prices under $2.00 a gallon?

Pathetic.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
25. Ha! The oil business....bush family bidness!
And the Moran can't even find oil in Texas! Yes indeed that is pathetic!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
7. At very least, the last question.
Everyone who was in my house watching the debate last night immediately came to the same conclusion: Bush was too well prepared for that. It's not the same as being prepared for a question on unemploymen, on taxes, and on schools, and of which are easily anticipated. This was different. It wasn't a necessary question .... the one on the environment which went unasked was necessary .... it was fluff. And while Bush does have an ability to respond with snappy one-liners, this was different also. It just appeared to be a prepared question to try to divert attention from the president's dismal failure in the rest of the debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. My brother said that the moderator was an old friend.
I hadn't heard that before, but it makes sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Bob S.'s brother was in business
with George W. Bush in Texas; co-owners of a baseball team.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
8. He still didn't answer them
Especially on abortion and homosexuality but then he was just keeping the bases tight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rockholm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
9. When the questions were being asked/read...
Bush seemed to be listening to someone,. He certainly was not looking at or listening to Bob Scheiffer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Francine Frensky Donating Member (870 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
10. Yes, I definitely got that feeling. Know what else is weird?
Now, I can't swear to this, but if someone has this on tape, perhaps they could check, when Schiefer read the rules at the beginning of the debate, did he say that neither candidate had seen the questions? I don't remember him saying that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oddtext Donating Member (268 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
11. yes i did
the flu question for example. he was way too eloquent on that one. i thought there was a leak when i heard that answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpaceCatMeetsMars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
12. That's what I thought
It seemed like he was reading his answers. I can't think why else he kept pausing and looking down...uh...uh....uh...even on the biggest softball -- the religion one. He is such an empty shell, he couldn't even speak on that one from his brain or heart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
13. He laughed at Bob's "email" comment before Bob mentioned the subject.
But...Bush was too hopped-up on something to be effective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
16. Absolutely not, because that 1st question caught him totally off-guard.
He looked like a kid getting a surprise pop quiz when Schieffer asked the flu vaccine question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. But that by itself -
doesn't really mean much - they had to throw him at least one or two surprise questions, just to make it look good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. eh...I just don't think he had the questions in advance.
The burden of proof is on positive evidence, and I just don't see any. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #16
29. But he had an answer all ready.
Just about the flu vaccine. He said he would selflessly not get one, like the brave and courageous leader we all know him to be.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Digit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
19. On some questions, he seemed TOO prepared.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Digit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
20. I also thought that Scheiffer "GEARED" the questions to favor *
Bob Scheiffer was clearly the MOST biased towards *
I lost all respect for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onecent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
21. Yes I think he definitely knew SOME of these questions! See thread
on "Check out this new ad on the DNC"..He's doing exactly what you are talking about. He laughs BEFORE the question is asked, or before the word "Administration"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AirAmFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
22. * had the ANSWERS. He didn't need the Qs, softballs geared to his stump
speeches from as long ago as summer 2000. It wasn't hard for Rove and Hughes to figure everything a timid Bob Schieffer might conceivably ask and craft all-pupose answers from scripts President Stupid already had used many times in the past.

Thus President Stupid had been rehearsing the answers for months or years. To prepare him for last night, all Rove and Hughes had to do was get him to choose the best available answer in response to any question. No matter what the question was, President Stupid already had rehearsed the answer he was going to give.

But on several occasions President Stupid managed to screw up even this simple a task. Did you notice how a 'No Child Left Behind' speech was his answer to questions about both unemployment and the minimum wage?

Rove and Hughes should have had a 'third base coach' standing in the auditorium to give President Stupid a signal that would trigger the answer his handlers preferred. They should have known better than to let a complete idiot call his own signals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
23. If you see the new DNC ad.."Not Funny"
..bush is laughing maniacally before bob gets the question out..he either knows the question or is on something or Both.

http://www.democrats.org/notfunny/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
24. And his answers still were weak at best.
That is pretty bad, cheat at the test and fail miserably, but that is what bush is best at, failure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sunnybrook Donating Member (986 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
26. some of us thought that at the second debate
In the second debate, which was held at my campus here in St. Louis, at one point Bush said something about an issue, I've forgotten now what it is, it may have been taxes or education. Anyway, it was not relating to what he'd been asked (surprise) and he said something like, we'll have a chance to talk about that later. Some of us caught that and were like "How would he know that is a topic for later?" Supposedly Charlie Gibson picked the questions from the panel and noone knew, etc... Sorry I don't remember this more clearly, but did anyone else catch that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
27. I don't
A large part of debate preparation includes practice questions on every topic the staff thinks could come up. Except for the first and last ones, each question covered a subject area that both Bush and Kerry have been talking about on the campaign trail and had probably drilled over and over and over in debate prep - health care, Social Security, the economy, jobs, gay marriage, abortion, immigration, minimum wage, the draft, affirmative action, assault weapons. I don't think it's strange that Bush was at least somewhat prepared to address each topic. Given the areas covered, I'd have been surprised if he weren't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
28. When the questions are based on guns, God , and gays
how could a programmed RW extremist go wrong? He didn't need the answers as long as the questions were underhand pitched to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC