|
Why was there not a SINGLE question about the environment in last night's debate? In a 90-minute debate about domestic issues, Bob Schieffer couldn't find the time for even one question about this issue that's of vital concern to millions of Americans. And, unfortunately, Kerry couldn't find a way to work it in to the discussion. Also (and largely as a result of its absence in the debate), there was no discussion of the environment in any of the post-debate analyses I saw.
Why is this important? I mean, no environmentalist would vote for Bush, right? So the Democrats don't need to mention it, right?
WRONG. The Bush environmental record is abysmal, and can easily be tied to energy (mention Cheney's secret energy task force meetings with major polluters, Enron, and power co. rate abuses), not to mention dependence on foreign oil.
Not only that, "the environment" is the physical world we all live in, not something separate from ourselves. It's the air we breathe, the water we drink, the streams we fish in, the food we eat, the fields our kids play on. The environment affects everyone.
For many of us, the environment is a hot-button issue that mobilizes us, as important as gay marriage, taxes, and anti-choice are to the Right. Furthermore, there are many conservatives and swing voters who are concerned about the environment.
Do I really need to point this out? Why aren't the Democratic strategists making the environment part of the talking points for the Kerry campaign?
|