Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AP: Bush 'Not Concerned' About Bin Laden in '02

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
montana500 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 06:06 PM
Original message
AP: Bush 'Not Concerned' About Bin Laden in '02
Bush 'Not Concerned' About Bin Laden in '02

Thu Oct 14, 1:50 PM ET Top Stories - Los Angeles Times



http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=2026&e=1&u=/latimests/20041014/ts_latimes/bushnotconcernedaboutbinladenin02


By Maura Reynolds Times Staff Writer

WASHINGTON — Sen. John F. Kerry (news, bio, voting record) caught President Bush (news - web sites) off guard during their final debate Wednesday night, asserting that the president once said he was "not concerned" about hunting down Al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden (news - web sites).


In one of the testiest moments of the evening, Bush protested, "I don't think I ever said I'm not worried about Osama bin Laden. That's kind of one of those exaggerations."


But during a news conference at the White House on March 13, 2002, Bush said something close to what Kerry quoted. "I truly am not that concerned about him," the president said, according to the official White House transcript.


The exchange between Bush and Kerry came during rebuttals to the first question of the debate, when moderator Bob Schieffer of CBS News asked Kerry whether the United States would regain the sense of security it had before the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.


"Six months after he said Osama bin Laden must be caught dead or alive, this president was asked, 'Where's Osama bin Laden?' " Kerry said. "He said, 'I don't know. I don't really think about him very much. I'm not that concerned.' We need a president who stays deadly focused on the real war on terror."


Bush's original comment came while U.S. forces in Afghanistan (news - web sites) were searching for the Al Qaeda leader, who had eluded joint American-Afghan military operations designed to find him.


"We haven't heard much from him. And I wouldn't necessarily say he's at the center of any command structure. And, again, I don't know where he is," Bush said during the 2002 news conference. "I'll repeat what I said. I truly am not that concerned about him. I know he is on the run.


"I was concerned about him when he had taken over a country," Bush continued. "I was concerned about the fact that he was basically running Afghanistan and calling the shots for the Taliban. But once we set out the policy and started executing the plan, he became — we shoved him out more and more on the margins. He has no place to train his Al Qaeda killers anymore."




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hey, this is Amazing! The media
is actually reporting on this..with quotes and everything!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. "one of those exaggerations"
Edited on Thu Oct-14-04 06:16 PM by The_Casual_Observer
chimp said it just like a crooked televangelist would have after somebody accused them of fraud or child molestation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Soup Bean Donating Member (757 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. Farenheit 911.
Bush should have had SOMEBODY watch it for him. That's one of Michael Moore's most powerful clips. Absolutely hilarious. Bush and Cheney are both second class liars. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nordic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. it's getting freeped in the ratings. RATE IT!
Pleeze ....!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thecrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Done
Gave it a FIVE
( and you can, too! )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shawmut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. done n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. montana500
Per DU copyright rules
please post only four
paragraphs from the
copyrighted news source.


Thank you.

DU Moderator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kinkistyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
8. Bush said something "similar"??
I think Kerry just about quoted what Bush said word-for-word. Stupid whore media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psst_Im_Not_Here Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
9. And while we're at it
We might as well rate up the next story too.

Halliburton's Interests Assisted by White House

WASHINGTON — Over the last four years, the Bush administration and Vice President Dick Cheney (news - web sites)'s office have backed a series of measures favoring a drilling technique developed by Halliburton Co., Cheney's former employer.

The technology, known as hydraulic fracturing, boosts gas and oil production and generates $1.5 billion a year for the company, about one-fifth of its energy-related revenue. In recent years, Halliburton and other oil and gas firms have been fighting efforts to regulate the procedure under a statute that protects drinking water supplies.

<snip>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
10. If Dems had power and if the story about bin Laden being in China is
true, the Dems would negotiate with China to get his release after the Dems win - similar to the Iran hostage release with Carter-Reagan. History shows that the Reagan people had the CIA and military working for them. One of the many blatant examples of a traditionally right wing intelligence and military.

Our citizenship was highjacked a long time ago when the right wing took over the FBI, CIA, military, and (probably) some other intelligence units.

Dem leaders are quite weak when it comes to coordinated efforts to counter the extremely coordinated efforts of the right wing.

Bush people are so vulnerable because of their alliance with the Saudi regime and their major support of the Sharon regime and Dem leaders don't speak up much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I just realized how far I've gone in realizing that our true enemy is
within our own country. I am one sad citizen for what our own people have done to us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Killarney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
12. rated that a 5!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
13. "I don't really think about him very much. I'm not that concerned"
That should be on the lips of every DUer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC