Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

OMG, a fundie school board member tonight mentioned DRED SCOTT!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Moonbeam_Starlight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 09:09 PM
Original message
OMG, a fundie school board member tonight mentioned DRED SCOTT!
We had a school board meeting tonight and our resident loony fundie AGAIN tried to get permission to hand out her Ten Commandment book covers in the schools. When the rest of the school board (with the exception of one member) objected (AGAIN! This is about the tenth time she has tried it), she cited Dred Scott and said she is the "victim of religious slavery."

The school board president is black. He proceeded to smack her down about slavery. Parents and teachers in attendance burst into applause.

OK WHAT is up with using Dred Scott now? A lot of us who are Kerry supporters were SO weirded out by that. She just threw it out there.

(She lost, by the way. She always does, but I guarantee she'll bring it up again next month. Fortunately too many of our school board members and the super have common sense--and are Dems, by the way and don't stand for her fundie crap.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jade Fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. I am so sick of Christians who play the victim....
With a church on every other block in this country, how do these people
manage to see themselves in that light?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. was she a ...
white racist christian republican so typical of the core support of the repub party that secretly wishes slavery was returned so the dred scott decision could be reinstated?

Msongs
Riverside CA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jazzgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Sounds like it to me.
}(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moonbeam_Starlight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. You pretty much described her, yeah
she is a BIG time fundie too. BIG.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cerridwen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. I saw on another DU thread - link below
Edited on Thu Oct-14-04 09:22 PM by nemdaille
that Dred Scott is related to the anti-choice argument to get rid of Roe v. Wade.

It's explained in the link.

Gimme a sec.

here's the DU link with a link to the blog about the connection.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=103&topic_id=78885

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eye and Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
5.  the code word for the Christian insurgent cells -"when the pResident sez"
The code was "when you hear the pResident say "Dred Scott" in a major speech, that's when you use Plan X."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. This... in TEXAS? Wow, I'm impressed!
Tell your school board pals a Brazilian says hi and :yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moonbeam_Starlight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. Ok!
Yeah my suburb has managed to stay decent and not get taken over by right wing fundie nut jobs.

But a lot of the decent Dems on the board are nearing retirement age, so my peers and I have had meetings to discuss recruitment committees to replace them with good Dems when the time comes (we work for the district so cannot run for school board).

We are also active in keeping fundies off City Council, as well. Our mayor is a republican, but not a repuke, if that makes sense. He is like one of those old-timey moderate fiscally conservative, but doesn't really give a shit what you do in your private life republican.

Really he SHOULD be a dem, I think he is just holding on to the label.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. Now, I see the Roe/Scott connection, it is not about ACTIVIST judges
Justice Taney was following the letter of the law in the Scott decision.

These folks are suggesting that the Justices are culturally wrong, in the same way Justice Taney was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
8. They have balls. Americans Christians are a majority in the population
and they act as though they were a persecuted minority group. They will never accept that this country is a constitutional democracy that protects the rights of a VALID minority, rather than a majoritarian democracy wherein the most hands raised wins the issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moonbeam_Starlight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. That's the thing, though
she was claiming that SHE and HER interests were a valid MINORITY.

Yep. Right here in Texas, the Bible Belt.

It is to laugh. Or puke.

The great thing was the outright derision by the audience. People were rolling their eyes so hard and loudly scoffing and saying "Oh my GOD" in stage whispers and then clapping when someone with common sense smacked her down.

Whew.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
9. Let's remember the immortal words of the Christian Coalition...
Just recently, one of their prominent people said the following, 'You must destroy the ENEMY! If you have to go under them, around them, or over them, do it! Do whatever it takes to make OUR GOD's word the ONLY word in our Congress, in our SCHOOLS, in our town halls!". He was rallying the CC troops with that message. Destroy us? Very Christian of him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Google Dred Scott + Roe v Wade
there are lots of entries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
choicevoice Donating Member (297 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Don't take this too lightly.....
They are serious and this rhetoric is being spewed in churches all around America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moonbeam_Starlight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. Oh we know she's serious
that's why when she had her husband run against a school board member up for re-election this past May (the black one who told her off tonight) we made DAMN sure her husband didn't win. He was defeated 70% to 30%.

And she's got her son running against another decent member who is up for reelection next spring. He's only 21 years old. We're gonna smack him down too.

Then SHE'S up for reelection in 2006 and we are already actively recruiting to find a strong candidate to knock her ass off the board.

Then NO MORE FUNDIES EVER!!! That is our rallying cry. Everyone hates her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
12. Good Christians at the time had plenty of arguments to support slavery
Everything from slavery being an accepted institution in the Bible to stuff about Ham seeing Noah naked and being cursed with being a slave to his brothers.

Many or most of the abolitionists were working out of a basis in Christianity, but their beliefs were of a far more philosophical and abstract nature. The literal scripture-quoters were almost all on the pro-slavery side. And it's those people, of course, who are the intellectual ancestors of the literal scripture-quoters today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
14. Abolitionists were liberals
The people who supported Dred Scott were southern fundmentalist Christians. Shove that up her butt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moonbeam_Starlight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. She wouldn't be offended by that at all
because she is a fundie herself.

I could NOT believe she claimed "religious slavery" to a black man. You should have heard the loud, collective GASP. The great thing is it was on local access cable and my husband was watching it at home. When I came home he said "that lady is NUTS."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. Uhm, that's their argument
That Dred Scott was wrong, therefore Supreme Court decisions aren't always right. My point being, by her fundamentalist values, she would have supported Dred Scott at the time because she wouldn't have wanted to associated with those liberal fringe abolitionists. Liberals are always right, it just takes the fundamentalists a couple of hundred years to catch up. And yes, it would bother her to be put on the side of racists in front of the whole school board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
secular_warrior Donating Member (705 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
19. For the fundies, Roe=Dred
Edited on Thu Oct-14-04 10:52 PM by secular_warrior
The way they see it:

1.Roe and Dred both deny human rights to a class of people categorized as property.

2.Roe and Dred both are cases where the judge intrepreted the Constitution through the lens of his personal opinion.

3.Roe and Dred both are examples where a precedent was set that allowed lawmakers and the public to ignore horrors and injustice for many years.

The anti-choice movement often cites the Dred case; they view themselves in a similar light to abolitionists, and the unborn as "slaves".

What Bush said to them (in code) was that he would appoint justices who were "strict contructionists", i.e judges who would not use personal opinion to interpret the Constitution, i.e. judges who would overturn any prior ruling decided on personal opinion - of which they consider Roe to be one.

----------
on edit: Here is the link to the article explaining all of this:
http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml%3Fi=20041101&s=pollitt


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. It's only "code" to people who haven't paid any serious attention

to pro-life views. It's not a secret that pro-life activists have long compared Roe to Dred Scott. There was a lengthy article about this, among other things, in The Atlantic at least ten years ago.

It's also important to remember that not all pro-lifers are fundies. You should say "For pro-lifers, Roe is equivalent to Dred," rather than "For the fundies, Roe=Dred."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undercover_brother Donating Member (296 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
20. They are priming the pump for a Roe vs Wade battle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC