WHO'd EVER believe ONE SOLDIER against the Military and other soldiers???

[LynnTheDem]

Would YOU BELIEVE ONE SOLDIER who said X. . .

When the US Military said Y; when the US Military after-action reports (damage assessment & repairs reports) all said Y; when ALL the other soldiers who were there said Y?

When even the enemy said Y?

WHO WOULD YOU BELIEVE???

Who would ANY RATIONAL PERSON BELIEVE?

So WHY would anyone believe the SB Liars???

-US Navy boats damage reports show heavy damage from bullets

-US Navy repairs reports show repairs of bulletholes

-ALL the SB crewmen who were THERE, except ONE, said there was HEAVY ENEMY FIRE

-The ENEMY and the VILLAGERS said there was HEAVY ENEMY FIRE

But rightwingnuts believe the SB Liars who say there was no enemy fire.

Even though the SB Liars WERE NOT THERE. NONE OF THEM.

Except one.

SB Liar Thurlow was there for ONE incident; Thurlow REFUSED to show his Navy file. The media filed under the FOIA and got his file. And the file shows THURLOW got a medal...for being UNDER ENEMY FIRE.

John O'Neill was NOT IN VIETNAM until after Kerry was BACK in the USA.

But the rightwingnuts believe O'Neill.

Who would ANY RATIONAL PERSON BELIEVE?

And THAT'S why the rightwingnuts believe the SB Liars.

Rightwingnuts better hope like hell they NEVER end up charged with a crime and find themselves in front of a RIGHTWINGNUT JURY.

[demokatgurrl]

1. The kind of idiot who would vote for Bush would believe it. n/t

[Hav]

2. .

Why? Because he says what they wish were true.

[StClone]

3. Apparently you missed a great Night Line last night

John O'Neil was absolutely maniacal defending his tenets against Viet Nam citizens who witnessed the Swift Boat Silver Star incident. They corroborate what is on record and SB Bozo was left repeating, and holding up the same book quotes over actual eye witnesses of the incident. O'Neill would bend a fork...he is past well-done.

[LynnTheDem]

4. I saw it.

And the freepers think O'Neill hammered Koppel.

Nothing changed.

[StClone]

5. Bubble people

I now suggest a social or psychological expert investigate this phenomena. When the absolute facts fly against a political group's beliefs they will pervert the facts, bend reality and/or hold fast to one small fact that defends their ideas when all others point to a simpler explanation. For balance of their waking time they visit web sites, hang with people and expose themselves to media that gives their point of view exclusively. This isn't in any way healthy.