Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Snowmobile ban in national parks overturned

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
montana500 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 11:48 AM
Original message
Snowmobile ban in national parks overturned
Snowmobile ban in national parks overturned
New rules could allow machines use in Yellowstone, Grand Tetons

Nati Harnik / AP file
Snowmobilers pause to watch passing bison near Norris Junction inside Yellowstone National Park in 2002.
The Associated Press
Updated: 12:38 p.m. ET Oct. 15, 2004CHEYENNE, Wyo. - A federal judge on Friday struck down a ban on snowmobiles in Yellowstone and Grand Teton national parks, calling it a "prejudged, political" move.



The decision could clear the way for new rules that allow the machines.

U.S. District Judge Clarence Brimmer ruled that the Clinton-era ban was invalid because it did not involve adequate public participation and failed to follow federal law.

The rule was "the product of a prejudged, political decision to ban snowmobiles from all the national parks," Brimmer wrote in an opinion.

The National Park Service is expected to issue a new rule governing snowmobile use next month in time for the coming winter season.


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6254919/


The ban, adopted during the Clinton administration and set to take effect last winter, was set aside in early 2003 by the park service to settle a lawsuit filed by snowmobile makers. Under the agreement, new rules were drafted to allow a limited number of snowmobiles inside the parks.

Attorneys for snowmobile manufacturers, winter resorts and other tourism-related ventures asked a federal judge last month to permanently lift the ban so businesses could have peace of mind about their survival.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. Got to protect that tourism income on federal lands.....
....is that the influence from the Marriott Corporation lobby?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasSissy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. I reallllly hate to hear this. Fed. judges are apptd., aren't they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
montana500 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. whats hilarious is that
the clinton plan had 4 comment periods and set a record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
montana500 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. whats hilarious is that
the clinton plan had 4 comment periods and set a record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
3. There was a huge amount of public input opposing the snowmobiles
Prejudiced and political decision?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I haven't read the decision but in general
Edited on Fri Oct-15-04 12:03 PM by depakote_kid
it's difficult to legally overturn an administrative rule, so long as there's some evidence to support it and the Administratice Procedures Act has been followed. Of course, Republicans care NOTHING for law and procedure, so this is probably just another instance of ight wing projection, i.e. the Court itself is the one making a prejudiced and political decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. understood ... eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC