Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is this true? Any incumbent presidential candidate who polls under 50%

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 01:30 PM
Original message
Is this true? Any incumbent presidential candidate who polls under 50%
this close to an election NEVER WINS??? Some talking head said that the other day and I was wondering if it's true. Anyone know?

If it's true, the chimp is finished.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GOPNotForMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. If you're talking approval ratings....
I think Truman was the only one to be reelected with an approval rating below 50 percent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. because then, like now, dems are underpolled.
most of the new voters are dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ramapo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. Nothing's true until it happens
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. The polls two weeks before the 1948 election said Truman would lose
However, I'm not sure all the data was collected that close to the release date. Communication and polls were different then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. 9-11 changed everything
actually the coup of 2000 changed everything
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soleft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
6. Here's a link to the Mark Shields article -
He shows that the vote on election day for incumbents is usually what they've polled at and challengers usually do better

http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/10/11/point.spread/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pmbryant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. That's exactly what the numbers show
I've looked at the poll data going back 30 years or so, and it's very true that incumbents pretty much get what they polls they will get. Sometimes they get less. They never get more.

So if Bush is at 48% or under, and if this pattern holds, he will lose. (Unless 3rd party candidates take over 4% of the vote, and I find that possibility to be unlikely. 3rd party candidates will do worse than they did in 2000, when they got about 3.5%, IIRC.)

--Peter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthside Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
7. Read This.
Ignore the Point Spread

If anyone tells you that the latest authoritative national poll shows President George W. Bush either running 4 percentage points ahead of or 2 points behind Massachusetts Sen. John F. Kerry, pay him no attention. Ignore the messenger completely. ... History shows that the percentage of the vote that an incumbent president gets in the major polls before Election Day is an accurate predictor of the percentage of the vote the incumbent will win on Election Day. Thus, in Molyneux's judgment, the "incumbent who fails to poll above 50 percent is in grave danger of losing his job." In the four most recent elections where an incumbent president sought re-election -- Bill Clinton in 1996, George H.W. Bush in 1992, Ronald Reagan in 1984 and Jimmy Carter in 1980 -- in the three major polls of the broadcast networks and their newspaper partners, the incumbent won the same percentage of the actual vote (or less) as he had received in the polls in three elections. Only Ronald Reagan, who had polled 58 percent of the vote and then actually won 59 percent of the vote, exceeded the average of the three network surveys. The numbers of the challengers -- a list that includes third party candidate Ross Perot twice -- run better on Election Day than they do in the pre-election measures of public opinion. The average increase on Election Day in the actual vote for a challenger to a president is 4 percentage points.

Mark Shields, CNN - October 13, 2004
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
speedoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Also read what Charlie Cook says:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grace0418 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
9. I personally don't think that any precedent set
at any previous election will apply to this one. Whether it's the polls, approval ratings, what Missouri does, what Ohio does, nothing. This election is like no other we've seen so we can't be worried about precedents, good or bad. We can only worry about what we do in the next 2.5 weeks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dolstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
10. Thanks to Nader, Bush doesn't need to get 50% to win.
Edited on Fri Oct-15-04 01:40 PM by dolstein
Thanks again Ralph. Go f*** yourself!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
12. You could call 50% an arbitrary number
Clinton and Reagan were in the mid to high 50% range in terms of approval, while Poppy and Carter couldn't get their heads above 40%.

The argument that has been made for several months is that no incumbent with an approval rating so low has ever won an election, and that no incumbent with an approval rating so high has ever lost.

Truthfully, we won't know until November 2.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC