|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-04 01:30 PM Original message |
Is this true? Any incumbent presidential candidate who polls under 50% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GOPNotForMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-04 01:31 PM Response to Original message |
1. If you're talking approval ratings.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewYorkerfromMass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-04 01:32 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. because then, like now, dems are underpolled. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ramapo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-04 01:32 PM Response to Original message |
2. Nothing's true until it happens |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
genius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-04 01:33 PM Response to Original message |
4. The polls two weeks before the 1948 election said Truman would lose |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-04 01:36 PM Response to Original message |
5. 9-11 changed everything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
soleft (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-04 01:37 PM Response to Original message |
6. Here's a link to the Mark Shields article - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pmbryant (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-04 01:39 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. That's exactly what the numbers show |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earthside (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-04 01:37 PM Response to Original message |
7. Read This. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
speedoo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-04 01:42 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. Also read what Charlie Cook says: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grace0418 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-04 01:39 PM Response to Original message |
9. I personally don't think that any precedent set |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dolstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-04 01:39 PM Response to Original message |
10. Thanks to Nader, Bush doesn't need to get 50% to win. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-04 01:46 PM Response to Original message |
12. You could call 50% an arbitrary number |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:36 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC