Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clark- Promoting Equal Pay For Women

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 08:19 PM
Original message
Clark- Promoting Equal Pay For Women
Note: mentions minimum wage of $7 by 2007. That seems woefully inadequate, IMO. However, Equal Pay policy sounds good.

Promoting Equal Pay- no copyright.

Equal pay for equal work is only fair, according to Wes Clark. On Monday morning, Clark told a roundtable at Stonyfield Farm in Londonderry, New Hampshire about his plan to close the pay gap for American women.

"The amount of money you earn in this country should be determined by one thing: the amount you contribute," said Clark, "and until women in this country earn 100 cents for every dollar men earn - we all lose out."

Today, women still earn only 73 cents for every dollar men earn. For example, in 2001, women in sales earned only about 62% of what men in equivalent positions earned. Women in construction earned 71% of what men in that industry earned.

The statistics for women of color are even worse: African American women earn only 64 cents, and Hispanic women earn only 55 cents, for every dollar earned by white men.

"Unequal pay isn't just a women's issue," said Clark. "When women are shortchanged, families are shortchanged, and that's simply unacceptable."

In a growing number of families, women are the primary breadwinners. In 22 percent of families with children women are the sole income earners.

Since the passage of the Equal Pay Act, we have made progress in closing the pay gap. But, in recent years, progress has slowed. Wes Clark has a plan to put us back on track to closing the pay gap.

"In my Administration, the rule will be simple: you discriminate, you pay," Clark said. His plan will increase penalties on employers who discriminate. He will help women vindicate themselves in court by making it easier to sue discriminators and recover compensatory and punitive damages against them.

Clark supports improving pay for women, increasing the minimum wage to $7 an hour by 2007, improving job training and expanding continuing education. His Families First Tax Reform plan will help ease the burden on single mothers, by putting more money back in their bank accounts.

He will do more to eliminate the excuses for pay inequity. Clark will expand family and medical leave to cover businesses with 25 or more employees and appointments related to school, health care, and domestic violence.

"Closing the pay gap isn't going to be easy," Clark concluded. "It's going to take a higher standard of leadership. Leadership that puts America's interests above the special interests. Leadership that promotes open, honest government, and holds people accountable. Leadership not just for the next election, but for the next generation."

Story Link here: http://www.clark04.com/story/73/
Policy Paper here: http://www.clark04.com/issues/equalpay/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
imhotep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. blatent pandering
Clark knows most women despise him, and this platitude gimmick won't fool them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmaier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. My goodness,
The sniping has no bounds. Which majority of the women are you speaking for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrats unite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Apparently not the one's supporting Clark!
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 08:26 PM
Original message
lol
Edited on Mon Jan-12-04 08:26 PM by Bleachers7
Now that's what I call bashing

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. Think again
sweetheart. What's wrong? Are you upset that Clark is smarter than your freeper candidate? Oh, well. Such is life. Deal with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stickdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. Who cares about sexism? Clark has never married a black woman.
Therefore, he's obviously insensitive to this country's racial issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah!
Are we throwing a fit because Clark is smarter than your freeper candidate? Waaaaaa! BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! Fucking HOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. I think it's great that he's following CMB's lead in getting this issue on
the table.

He had better watch out for AS at the next debate, however. The gender pay gap in the military is pretty large, even with some controls factored in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Is he in charge of detirmining what the military pay is?
No. I don't think so. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Excuse me, you may be forgetting a few points
1) pay is at least partially a function of what job one holds. Do generals have any influence over who is appointed to what jobs?

2) There are MANY civilians employed on military bases, and many of them are women. Do you claim generals have no influence over civilian pay increases?

3) At the time one is a general can one one speak about pay issues and order pay equity studies?

As I said, I'm glad CMB is no longer the only one raising pay equity issues. I happen to believe that Clark is sincere about this, but time will tell.

I believe Sharpton was unfair to some degree in his comments to Dean, who has no more control over the demographics of Vermont. Unless Sharpton now believes he was unfair, I don't know why you would expect him not to raise the question with Clark as to whether he has truly walked the walk.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. add point 4) military employees' pay also can be affected
by management policies and practices.

http://www.princetonreview.com/cte/articles/military/armyoverview.asp

"Soliders receive medical and dental care, earn 30 days vacation annually, and a salary that increases with promotion. Rises in rank and pay grade occur over time, based on how long an individual has been in his/her current rank, and also on *merit*." (my *emphasis*)

Any system that allows for subjective factors such as merit to be included is at least partially controlled by managers, and also allows for bias.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. A penalty for discrimination?
I love this man! It's about damn time someone started addressing this issue. When a woman is working the same job as a man and being paid less than him......that is criminal. Kudos to Wes for having the guts to bring this to the forefront.

Go, Wes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC