BUSHOUT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-16-04 12:59 AM
Original message |
Should we have a dedicated Sinclair activism area? Cast your vote.. |
|
I've seen many worthwhile Sinclair topics waste away into the archives...shelved by lesbian and poll topics.
Any chance of a dedicated Sinclair area?
This is the FIRST TIME IN MY LIFE I've seen electioneering by a broadcaster in North America. We need a continued and focussed effort to beat this enemy of democracy, no matter what happens in the next few weeks.
|
okTracer
(44 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-16-04 01:16 AM
Response to Original message |
1. How about a media activism area |
|
Hell Ya! With all of the recent activities of various right wing CEOs.
|
BUSHOUT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-16-04 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. I'm suggesting more of an area dedicated strictly to Sinclair activism. |
|
They've thumbed thier nose at democracy. They're f#$king with the best of what America is.
|
saracat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-16-04 01:47 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. Good idea. Would you post email addys for sponsors and Ceo's? |
BUSHOUT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-16-04 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. Those are already available at the DU sinclair page. |
|
See the link at the top of DU.
Also, the DailyKos page is a good resource. www.dkosopedia.com/index.php/Sinclair_Broadcast_Group#Pullout
New resources pop up all the time.
My thinking is that a dedicated area would provide a focussed place for Sinclair topics...good news stories....personal rants....activism alerts...ect ect ect, which would be separate from all the lesbian and Jenna Bush threads.
The DU focus against Sinclair is great, but IMHO it suffers from not having a dedicated area where people can focus thier energy and/or get re-energized.
|
BUSHOUT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-16-04 01:42 AM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:24 AM
Response to Original message |