Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Haha - Check out partisan breakdown of latest Newsweek poll

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
unfrigginreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 11:35 AM
Original message
Haha - Check out partisan breakdown of latest Newsweek poll
354 Republicans (plus or minus 6)
317 Democrats (plus or minus 6)
284 Independents (plus or minus 6)

http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/041016/nysa012_1.html

----------

Tells me that Kerry probably has a lead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. 0 First time voters
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doosh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. why do they always oversample repugs???
Edited on Sat Oct-16-04 11:37 AM by Doosh
I mean, isn't the current electorate like 36% Dem, 32% repug 32% indy/other?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dolstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Why do you assume the electorate is 36% dem?
Perhaps it was in 2000. But how can you assume that there has been NO CHANGE in the partisan balance during the past four years?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unfrigginreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Deja Vue
That's the same argument the pollsters used for Bush's lead in the 2000 polls. It's still bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. I Don't Have A Link But Pew Said Party ID Is Where It Was In 2000
They said there was a spike in Republican ID after 9-11 but it's abated....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
21. Why do you assume that the % OF Pugs has increased.
Maybe it's now 28% Pugs, 40% Dems.

Anyway, I think the oversampling of Pugs is due to the assumption that they're more likely to vote. Given the anger and animation among Dems this year, I believe that this is, to put it mildly, not a safe assumption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philostopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Maybe that's who responds.
They may do a certain number of calls, and that's the measure of the responses they get. They're under time pressure, after all, to get these things done and tabulated -- maybe more people who identify as Republicans are willing to respond to the phone polling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. That could be, but then they should plaster the results of the poll
with that information instead of including it in fine print somewhere.

The media want this race to appear close so that people will keep watching their commercials, I'm convinced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philostopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. I agree they should be more up-front about it.
I think the whole 'caller ID/cell phone' argument begs the question if any phone poll can really be considered accurate anymore, and some of the pollsters will admit this when pressed on the question, but they never remind people about that on the polls themselves, either. Polls are useful as tracking instruments, but there's been an enormous demographic shift in the past few years because of technological changes that they can't account for. I also think you're right that it's a revenue issue -- I doubt media pollsters will ever show a dramatic lead in a presidential election again because if people think it's all over too soon, they'll stop paying attention to the media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. You Nailed It....
The first 1,000 people who meet their criterion of registered voters are included...


They weight for race, gender, region, et cetera but not party...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philostopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #13
18. And as I said above,
it doesn't account for the demographic shifts caused by new technologies like cell phones and caller I.D. They do the best they can to get the most random sample possible, but lots of people don't answer their phones if the Caller ID says 'out of area' or doesn't identify the caller (we're two of them), and nobody has a comprehensive list of cell phone numbers to use.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
featherman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #2
15. Actually 39-35-26
Dems are still the majority party in this country, a fact many seem to have forgotten. GOP has NEVER exceeded 35% of the proportional vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
3. I wipe my ass with newsweek.
It's not even good for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. LOL n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
19. maybe good for a campfire still
as long as you don't pay for it. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
4. Doesn't make much sense, huh?
Not representative of the US public.

37% R
33% Dem
30% Indie

Not from everything I read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #4
16. Check this out
Kerry leads Bush by 11 among independents in this poll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. There's the RUB! With that advantage, no way Kerry will lose the REAL
poll on Nov. 2!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K8-EEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
6. Kerry. In. A. Landslide.
If they say we're tied, it can ONLY mean Kerry in a LANDSLIDE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
9. That Poll Reveals Them As Rank Fucking Idiots....
I'll bet my home and car if Kerry is "really" winning men by three or four percent on election day and winning indys 51-40 percent there's no way he's going to lose...

Why do pollsters do this shit...


Garbage in ...Garbage out....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
14. Bah, ignore all polls they are a waste of time. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC