ABC/Washington Post Tracking Poll: Bush 50% Kerry 46%

[tritsofme]

Kerry down 1% from yesterday

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/elections/2004/charting.html

[WI_DEM]

1. Let me be the first to say, "BUNK"

[Bleacher Creature]

2. Let me be the second

"BUNK"

[Kierkegaard]

3. Let me be the third: "BUNK" and might I add...

"I expell methane from my hind quarters in the general direction of those pollsters."

[trotsky]

4. Bush maintains 7 point lead over...

October 29, 2000
Web posted at: 12:54 p.m. EST (1754 GMT)

By CNN Polling Director Keating Holland

WASHINGTON (CNN) - GOP presidential candidate Texas Gov. George W. Bush continued to maintain an advantage over Democratic Vice President Al Gore in Sunday's CNN/USA Today/Gallup tracking poll.

Forty-nine percent of respondents said they supported Bush while 42 percent said they would vote for Gore, no change at all from Saturday's poll.
snip--------
CNN/USA TODAY/GALLUP POLL
October 25-27
Likely Voters' Choice for President

Bush 49%

Gore 42

Nader 3

Buchanan 1

Sampling error: +/-2.5 percentage points

Here are results from some other national polls on the presidential race

Bush Gore

ABC News/Washington Post 47 46
MSNBC/Reuters/Zogby 44 43

[yellowcanine]

5. Weekend uptick for Bush - happened in 2000 also. Dems gain in midweek,

Pubs gain on weekends. By Tuesday, Kerry will be up again. Watch and see.

[tritsofme]

9. Yes polls conducted during the weekend usually favor

and that won't be reflected in the 3 day rolling average until tomorrow at the earliest.

[Randi_Listener]

6. BUNK

More fucked up polls

[creeksneakers2]

7. This chart has Kerry tied with Nader for 2% of the vote

On edit - They fixed it.

[cubsfan forever]

8. Two (4) words say it all: Washington Post

HORSE CRAP. But I repeat myself...(Mark Twain)

Professor 2

[59millionmorons]

10. ABC/POST didn't do well in 2000

Washington Post Gore-45 Bush-48 Nader-3

[tritsofme]

11. The other 4% had to go somewhere

With Gore's aggressive campaigning in the final days and DUI breaking, the undecideds broke toward him.

I'd say they didn't do too badly.

[cali]

12. Whether or not it's bunk

I'm not qualified to say. but than neither are the rest of you. More to the point, who gives a shit? The polls still indicate an incredibly close election. Remember 2000? Most of the polls gave bush a signifcant advantage that didn't pan out on election day. We have to stop worrying about this stuff. Kerry's doing well in the swing states and that's what counts.

[truthpusher]

13. Is there anyway polls can have there own category?

...Along with not watching Cable news, I am trying to avoid the polls - they are not reality based good or bad.