DemocratSinceBirth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-17-04 05:30 PM
Original message |
I Don't Like That Piece Of Shit Nader Is Back At 2% In Most Polls |
|
www.realclearpolitics.com
I wouldn't piss down his throat if his heart was on fire...
|
tritsofme
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-17-04 05:32 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Kerry only looses .2% in RCP average |
|
when Nader is added in.
Some of these might truly be only Nader voters.
I think 1.5-2% is probably what Nader will get.
|
DemocratSinceBirth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-17-04 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. Eugene McCarthy Who Was A Mere Serious Candidate |
|
Than Nader Could Ever Be Got Less Than One Percent As An Indy In 1976...
He was down to less than 1% for awhile...
I don't like the current polling trend...
|
NC_Nurse
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-17-04 05:34 PM
Response to Original message |
2. My hope is that it's all |
|
disenchanted Repubs who can't bring themselves to vote for Shrub; but can't stomach voting for Kerry either.
:nopity:
|
Quixote1818
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-17-04 05:34 PM
Response to Original message |
3. I think that percent goes down in battleground states |
Zinfandel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-17-04 05:39 PM
Response to Original message |
5. There is NO FUCKING way Nader will receive more than 1.2% this time!!!! |
|
Edited on Sun Oct-17-04 05:40 PM by Zinfandel
Nationwide??? No Green Party backing him this time, he's not even on the ballot in 20 states, People are aware of Nader's bullshit this time around.
NO FUCKING WAY Nader will receive in my opion 0.8% nationwide, that's about 1.2 million votes nationwide.
|
NightOwwl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-17-04 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
10. Tell us how you really feel Zinfandel... |
Chichiri
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-17-04 05:41 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Do you ever see a poll in which Nader is running at less than 2-3 percent? |
|
He's either running at around that level, or he's not included in the poll. That's because of the principle -- I wish I could remember where I first heard it -- that the inclusion of a name on a poll against the front runners guarantees 2-3 percent, for whatever odd reasons.
This is not unique to Nader; the Libertarian party is lucky to get a third of one-percent of the popular vote in an election, but when they do their own polling the question is basically, "Do you plan to vote for Bush, Kerry, or Badnarik?" Then they get all excited because Badnarik gets 3% of the vote.
|
DemocratSinceBirth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-17-04 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
12. Actually Most Polls Were Showing Him In The ..05% to 1% Range |
robbedvoter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-17-04 05:43 PM
Response to Original message |
7. He will not register a blip - it's a hoaz just as the "dead heat" thingy |
|
They love to make us believe it's 2000 all over again. Remember, Ralphie didn't find enough supporters to put him on the ballot in most states!
|
NightOwwl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-17-04 05:46 PM
Response to Original message |
8. When even Winona LaDukes, Nader's 2000 running mate |
|
endorses Kerry, I think it's safe to say any votes he gets are from those who won't vote for Kerry, whether Nader is on the ballot or not.
|
NMDemDist2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-17-04 05:49 PM
Response to Original message |
9. 3rd party candidate may help us in AZ we have a Libertarian on the |
|
ballot
it may be enough to tip us back to blue
Nader didn't make the ballot here
|
Mz Pip
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-17-04 06:07 PM
Response to Original message |
|
You can buy a T shirt that has "spoiler" printed on it through the Nader website.
THe people posing in it looked so proud of themselves. WTF are they thinking???
MzPip :dem:
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 09th 2024, 06:26 AM
Response to Original message |