Is anyone else surprised by how many papers admit Bush is a total failure?

[Arugula Latte]

I have gotten so cynical about the press I assumed most newspapers, with their corporate/Repube leaning publishers, would hold their noses and endorse Chimp again.

It's nice to know that some performances are so putrid that even conservatives can't deny the horror.

[blondeatlast]

1. No; what surprises me is the ones that find reasons to endorse

Commander Bunnypants.

[acmavm]

2. Yeah, what you said.

.

[meti57b]

3. bush is far worse than a failure, he pro-actively implements the worst...

possible action.

[MatrixEscape]

4. Another reason he should lose is ...

From our standpoint, he is not just a pathetic and frightening little man, his next four years would be a term of embarrassment, Nationally.

None of his campaign rhetoric can erase his tremendous failure. Only 9/11 was able to pull him out of the huge slump and deep morass. People forget that his failure and poor popularity poles were once mainstream news.

And he hasn't changed in that respect, only the rhetoric has.

[Justice]

5. Check out this MSNBC Poll - Trying to Diminish Newspaper endorsements

Do newspaper endorsements affect your vote for president?

* 17301 responses

Yes 16%
No 84%

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3096434/