dolstein
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-17-04 05:34 PM
Original message |
Is the Washington Post going to endorse Bush? |
|
Just curious. This formerly left-leaning paper has been sucking up to Bush for quite a while. Katherine Graham must be rolling over in her grave.
|
Shopaholic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-17-04 05:35 PM
Response to Original message |
1. They wouldn't--would they? |
|
I mean--Jesus--what the fuck would they be thinking if they did?
|
PCIntern
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-17-04 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. They would be thinking that they |
|
also didn't want to get their "'big fat tit' caught in a wringer" as your former Attorney General John Mitchell said about Katherine graham to Woodward on the phone late that night.
|
dennis4868
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-17-04 05:37 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Sun Oct-17-04 05:38 PM by dennis4868
of the Post on TV a few weeks ago and he hinted they may actually endorse Bush because of 911 and security issues.
HEY WP......UNDER WHICH PREZ DID 911 HAPPENED? FUCK YOU WP!!!
|
Mayberry Machiavelli
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-17-04 05:38 PM
Response to Original message |
4. If you've followed their editorial page shilling for Iraqnam, I'd give it |
|
at least 50/50 that they'll endorse shrubya.
|
liberalpragmatist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-17-04 05:40 PM
Response to Original message |
5. They'll give Kerry a "tepid" endorsement |
|
current editors are moderate liberals on social and economic issues but they're extremely hawkish - so basically neocons.
I can't remember where I read this - it was posted on DU. But some source claimed in another publication that it would probably be a "tepid" endorsement of Kerry.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:19 AM
Response to Original message |