Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Was the first debate Bush's "Ceausescu Moment"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
displacedyankeedem Donating Member (538 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-04 01:06 AM
Original message
Was the first debate Bush's "Ceausescu Moment"?
I was watching the clip of how citizens of Romania who were supposed to cheer at all of the communist bullshit rhetoric he espoused turned on him and started to boo. Before state-owned TV cut off the transmission, he had a look of utter bewilderment and disbelief at what he was hearing and seeing.

At the first debate in Miami, Bush had the exact same expression on his face as he tried to spout off his right-wing talking points which play well to his pre-screened and vetted crowds. Used to hearing everyone talk about how great he was, he didn't know how to handle himself in front of an audience, and it showed.

A few days later, Ceausescu was driven from power. I hope the analogy holds true in 15 days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
chookie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-04 01:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. Back in the USSR
I used to enjoy monitoring "news" broadcasts from the Soviet Union. They could be a real howl. No matter how miserable things were, they were always upbeat, and insisting that not only things were going well, but better than ever.
But the Russian people are not stupid, and always understood what BS all of it was, and managed to get facts through alternative means, and thus usually understood what was realy going on.

There was a method of information gathering from the Cold War, that even goes back to WWII, where Allies monitored broadcasts and figured out the facts by doing content analysis. Thus, if the Nazis claimed a glorious victory which would soon end the war, the Allies knew they had actually suffered horrible casualties; when the Soviets claimed harvests were up 3487%, Allies could tell that famine was occurring.

Germans in WWII used to listen to BBC in order to find out what was really happening. Why? Because they always (used to) tell the truth -- never sugar-coated it or made it propaganda.

I am astounded at how America "stupedia" mimicks the old Soviet model.

Disturbing, but the good news is that Americans are not QUITE as stupid as they are assumed to be. I am constantly amazed by my focus groups telling me that in spite of the reason that they just get their news from the mainstream, that they have figured out, using only their own brains and faculties of reason, that Bush is selling them very dangerous bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC