Doesn't look like the New York Times said Dean's camp was in trouble.

[Sean Reynolds]

Looked through the NY Times tonight searching for that headline that said Dean's campaign was in trouble; found nothing. JUST more of Drudge hyping up all this BS.

I love it though. The media has been hyping Dean's death since mid summer.

[dajabr]

1. I think this was supposed to be it...

Pretty tame if you ask me.

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/13/politics/campaigns/13DEAN.html

[Sean Reynolds]

3. Of course it is.

Drudge made it sound like the New York Times had a major article on how the wheels are coming off.

[hellhathnofury]

2. We're going to stop eventually...

to bad it's inaugaration day 2012.

[patricia92243]

4. The press admits that what doesn't kill Dean only makes him stronger!.....

Let's all keep on keeping on. Support Dean in every way you can - money, e-mails to distractors (let them know you contributed to the Dean campaign on their behalf), or whatever way you can help.

[dkf]

5. Oh good grief...is that it?

That is so pathetic its pretty funny.

Go Dean!

[Hoppin_Mad]

6. BAN DRUDGE FROM DU !

I just read that the Michael Moore endorsement might be a red herring too.

[hellhathnofury]

8. I echo. This is a forum for Democrats and progressives, not Drudge.

[Dookus]

7. Umm...

Drudge's title and the one posted here on the other thread was "Dean campaign hits turbulence."


The lead paragraph of the NYT article referenced reads:

PELLA, Iowa, Jan. 12 — In the closing days before the Iowa caucuses here, Howard Dean has slipped into turbulent territory, facing challenges in both Iowa and New Hampshire, the two states where he is looking to nail down the nomination with early victories.



Trouble is not the same as turbulence. Since turbulent and its noun, 'turbulence' are used in both the drudge headline and the NYT lead paragraph, I wouldn't say Drudge was terribly wrong in this.