Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dick Morris on Faux: Bush is in trouble. Only one way he can win.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
montana500 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-04 06:02 PM
Original message
Dick Morris on Faux: Bush is in trouble. Only one way he can win.
Suggests October surprise is Bush's only chance

MORRIS: “I think there’s gonna be a huge turnout. All the voter registration figures are up, the polling indicates.”

O’REILLY: “Who does that favor?”

MORRIS: “It probably favors Kerry. And I do believe he’ll get a very strong, very intense minority vote. There’s only one thing that can save George Bush. Think about how we felt in August. Think about how jeopardized and endangered we felt with photos of the stock exchange and IMF building circulating. The Al Qaeda militants, bombs possibly at the two conventions, the Olympics. We felt really in danger. Now we feel fat and happy. We’re felling pretty good. We turn on the TV set about Iraq. We watch it with half an eye, but nobody really thinks there’s gonna be anything happening here. If that’s the environment on November 2nd, Kerry’s gonna win. But, if - and I’m not suggesting Bush would fabricate it - - but if, in fact, Al Qaeda chooses to begin actions, to threaten stuff, to do stuff here, which they did in Israel and they did in Madrid right before the election, then I think that could elect Bush...Osama bin Laden will determine if Bush wins or not.”

Follow-up:

Morris just finished an appearance on “Big Story with John Gibson” (10/15/04, 5:03 PM EDT) in which he said essentially the same things, only this time he was very careful NOT to use the words “and I’m not suggesting Bush would fabricate it.”


http://www.newshounds.us/2004/10/15/dick_m...to_win.php#more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sofa king Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-04 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. And if Bush wins, so do the terrorists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ron Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-04 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. Exactly. Osama bin Laden is a smart guy, and he knows that
Bush in office does what Osama wants: divides the US and unites most of the civilized world against the US. What more could he want? Bush is Osama's candidate - now there's a meme.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike L Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-04 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #12
36. Correct. The Iraq War was an early Christmas present for al-Qaeda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-04 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. The only things Bush can ever use to win is fear, war and terror threats.
Nothing else can help him because he as no record on anything else and what record there is on terror and war show ineptitude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-04 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. The Spanish reaction was to blame the gov't in power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeBushytail Donating Member (862 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-04 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Spanish voters weren't happy
that the government tried to muddy the waters about who was responsible. They played up the theory that it was a Basque separatist bombing. Voters didn't like that.

Here Bush would be happy to shout Osama's name from the rooftops if there was an Al Qaeda attack. Anything to spread fear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-04 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
25. Oh my God, Bush couldn't protect us? This would be disasterous
Edited on Mon Oct-18-04 07:12 PM by juajen
for Bush and minions, IMHO. He's got to get his sword and cape and get the bastards, but he has sworn after over 1,000 American deaths and many thousands of injuries, untold amounts of Iraqi deaths and injuries, many, many billions of dollars spent and lost, that we are safer in America now that Sadaam is gone. Was IT ALL FOR NOTHING???? This will not fly. He is in a catch 22 of his own making, "Hoist with his own Petard". OHHHHHHHH, what beautiful imagery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
July Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-04 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #25
38. That's right, he keeps saying we're safer,
while his freeper friends keep pointing out that while we're fighting over THERE we're not being attacked HERE. You are correct, he can't have it both ways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tooncesj0nes Donating Member (129 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-04 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. I agree. the 'security' mom vote...
..that currently favors Bush would be jeopardized...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dutch Courage Donating Member (33 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-04 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
22. Because the government LIED
about the attack. Said it was ETA, even lobbied with that story at journalists. At that moment the polls were in the favor of the government. They, however, ignored the many indications it was an Al Quada attack. It took two days before that was totally clear. The public remembered the government also lied before about the shipwreck of an oil tanker, that polluted a great area of the Spanish and Portuguese coast. The people sent the government home at the election. The new, socialist government, did what they promised (and 90% of the Spanish people wanted) and sent their troops home from Iraq. NOT under pression of the terrorists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spoon Donating Member (401 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-04 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. He was interviewed on our local news radio station this morning,
and had the very same things to say. He's almost convinced that we'll be struck sometime before the election, ala Spain, Australia & Israel (1996). I tend to think he may be right (finally) on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n2mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-04 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
26. Disagree
Doubt if there will be a terrorist attack before the election. So here comes the fear folks, there won't be a terrorist attack unless the Shrub wins. If the Shrub wins, these terrorists are very angry, they will strike to get even. Shrub has increased their anger. I believe they will give Kerry a chance if he wins to see what he will do. I say pray if the Shrub wins, the terrorists have actually been very quiet.... how long do you think this will last? They are out to revenge the Shrub. Right now everything is too close to call, I don't think they will take any chances at this point unless the current administration has their foot in this. Just a thought....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bush equals idiot Donating Member (757 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-04 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. Bull crap they'd rally around him.
That would be two terror attacks on his watch. People would have to be dumber than kumquats to let him go for three.

The old terror attack ploy ay. Ha ha, I'm on to you.

Signed

Inspector Clousseau
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HawkerHurricane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-04 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
8. Absolutely True
"Osama bin Laden will determine if Bush wins or not.”

IF THERE IS A TERROR ATTACK BEFORE 02 NOV, IT MEANS THAT AL QUEADA WANTS BUSH TO WIN.

Say it loud and say it often.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-04 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
9. Any hint of a terrorist attack here in the U.S. will bring junior down
big time.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calmblueocean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-04 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
10. "Osama bin Laden will determine if Bush wins or not."
I can't decide whether this is more disgusting or stupid.

Morris means it as a slam on Kerry, but of course, it works both ways. If you seriously believe that Osama bin Laden is controlling our elections -- how effing repugnant -- then a Bush win would ALSO be due to Osama.

Which is to say that Bush screwed up so bad that Osama is making sure he's reelected for another four years. Dick Morris is the biggest jackass on TV.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MazeRat7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-04 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
11. Not to put on a tin foil hat but....
Sure sounds like he is trying to send a message to BC. And yes I do believe they would fabricate such an event if faced with the inevitable loss of power.

MZr7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slater71 Donating Member (586 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-04 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
13. Don`t believe him
Look at the ground hog turncoat SOB. I wouldn`t trust this fucking weasel no how, no way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mikimouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-04 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
14. I have long argued that this will be the October surprise...
I first said it months ago, and I believe it more and more firmly every day. The very best thing that could happen for * is exactly what Morris is talking about. Think back on the bullshit coming out of the * camp after Aznar was handed his walking papers. It was mostly: "those stupid Spaniards, they let themselves be intimidated into voting for Zapatero..." Of course, the inference was that WE would never kowtow to the terraists, but would vote for Mr. Macho, just to teach them terraists who's boss! Watch and see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-04 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Have there been any more attacks since Zapatero? I haven't seen any.
Could it be possible that he's running a better anti-terrorist program that Aznar? Do you think the terrorists just left Spain alone after they voted Aznar out of office?

Another attack won't help bush*. No way. It'll just underline what an incompetent screw up him and buddy Asscroft are. Fool me once and all that crap....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mikimouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-04 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. I have no problem with Zapatero, none at all...
Edited on Mon Oct-18-04 06:51 PM by Mikimouse
But the way that many Americans responded, plus the screeching from the WH about how the terraists influenced the Spanish elections, leads me to the conclusion that many Americans would dig in their heels and vote for *, as a stupod response to such an attack, just to differentiate themselves from the Spanish (who, incidentally, did absolutely the right thing by getting rid of Aznar and his * ass kissing bunch).
Of course the terrorists didn't leave Spain after Aznar was removed, that was not my point. My point was that after the attack in Spain, all of the RW radio and TV pundits were mewling about how the Spanish election was a product of terror, and that WE would never allow that kind of influence in OUR elelctions. * would use another attack in exactly that manner to get himself back in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-04 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #20
30. NO, NO, NO, NO, NO. Sorry, I wasn't being critical, I was really asking a
question. Have there been any more attacks. Apparently not. And I don't believe they left either. I just think that maybe Zapatero has this way more under control that Aznar did. Plus Aznar got caught lying like a big dog.

What I mean is that another attack happens here, and the American public, if they don't have their heads up their asses, should be able to see plainly and clearly that bush* is incompetent, and has to go.

I don't think that bush* could possibly pull it off if there was another attack on his watch.

If I sounded snipey and snippy, I'm sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mikimouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-04 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. I didn't take it as snippy at all...I apologize if I sounded as if I did..
I simply have little faith in the American public right now, and fear that playing to this comparison could prove disastrous for the future of the nation. I do think that Zapatero is doing a much better job than Aznar (or, Anzar as * first pronouced it).
I fervently hope that your assessment of the American publis is correct and that I am just being unnecessarily cynical about it. I really do, but when I listen to many people around me, I only hear repetitive RW talking points. Those folks don't even WANT to think for themselves, much less understand that it is their responsibility to do so.
I also fear that * and company are not beyond engineering something themselves to make this happen. I'm sorry, I feel like I have been living in the twilight zone for four years, walking in cold molasses as it were, with a dark cloud hanging over the nation.:toast: to you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kaitykaity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-04 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
16. How brazen.

Telegraphing Rove's plan like that.

Morris is gonna be on somebody's shit list.

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shopaholic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-04 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
17. I still maintain that OBL is hiding out in a really hard-to-find location
you know--like the Lincoln Bedroom. That's why they can't find him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-04 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
18. Dick was suggesting a new, fresh war for elections time...
Edited on Mon Oct-18-04 06:41 PM by robbedvoter
I suggest we bookmark this thread....
Either proof, or a good conversation piece in a few weeks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diana52 Donating Member (162 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-04 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
19. Huh?
I thought Saddam had the power?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-04 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
21. Okay.. that's it.. I'm locking my doors and never coming out!
The level of evil in that crowd has hit crisis proportions. That motherfucker has the nerve to suggest that a terror attack is Bush's last hope. Be afraid, be very very afraid. :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scavok Donating Member (48 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-04 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
23. Tin foil hat time...
I don't see how a terrorist attack helps Bush this late in the game. Real terrorists just don't work on a dependable enough time table. Besides, early voting has already started in a lot of places.

However, if the FBI and CIA were able to "foil" a really big "terrorist plot" just before November 2 it could be a real boost to the reelection effort.

It would prove that the Patriot Act works and all the doom and gloom from VP Cheney wasn't just a smokescreen.

And it would be unlikely that the fakery would be exposed until after the election.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-04 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #23
32. Hi scavok!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-04 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
24. Stealing the election is the only way Bu$h can win. The only way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bleacher Creature Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-04 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
27. CRAP!
This scares the hell out of me.

Dick Morris is ALWAYS the opposite of accurate. Remember 1998 when he said that the GOP would pick up 60 seats in the House?? I would be much more comfortable if he predicted a Bush landslide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasSissy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-04 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
28. I hope this is talked about and talked about, so people will recognize
it when it happens! IF it happens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-04 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
29. And if another attack happens, it's all over for *.
9/11 happened on *'s watch.

* has flip-flopped on so many other issues.

* had been given carte blanche since 9/11.

The people won't buy it this time around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-04 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
33. Suck some hooker toes and torch the Reichstag
Yum...

My favorite moment on the Daily Show, from 1998: (regarding Dick Morris' statement after meeting with the House Impeachment Managers) "Then he stepped out of frame and ate Eggs Parisienne off the ass of an aging prostitute."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-04 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
34. leave it to that cross-dressing toe-sucker to come up with a sleazy idea
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-04 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
35. Cheney follows advice: "terrorists may bomb US cities"
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20041019/ap_on_el_pr/cheney&cid=694&ncid=2043
CARROLL, Ohio - Vice President Dick Cheney (news - web sites) on Tuesday evoked the possibility of terrorists bombing U.S. cities with nuclear weapons and questioned whether Sen. John Kerry (news - web sites) could combat such a threat, which the vice president called a concept "you've got to get your mind around."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike L Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-04 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
37. Bush can d the same thing by ordering a full scale assault on Fallujah.
No one believes me about this, but AWOL's numbers went up 4-5% in April when he assaulted Fallujah. He got a crisis bump from it because our troops were in a big battle.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrFunkenstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-04 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
39. Fat, Happy, Unemployed, Without Health Care
These really are the golden days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarcojon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-04 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
40. ...and I’m not suggesting Bush would fabricate it...
How f'ing telling is this? Morris acknowledging that there are plenty of people who would not put this administration above fabricating a terrorist attack.

Like some others here, I feel the far more likely scenarion is a faked foiled terrorist attack right before the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC