Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What if Colorado is apportioned?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
I Lean Left Donating Member (487 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-04 11:39 PM
Original message
What if Colorado is apportioned?
My understanding is that the referendum would apply immediately if passed. Does anyone know how it is polling? Will it be close? If it is close, they'll have to freeze the electoral votes out of Colorado until they have a difinitive answer (not to mention legal challenge!)

Ideally, the margin won't be close as to make it pivotal. Are any of the electoral count models using a split Colorado? Kerry getting 4 electoral votes out of Colorado would offset losing NH for example. If he knew for certain the referendum was going to pass, he could move resources out of NH. Or more directly, he could move resources out of Colorado and into Arizon and New Mexico where it would still be winner take all.

Just wondering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
atre Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-04 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. If the amendment passes...
Edited on Mon Oct-18-04 11:44 PM by atre
Kerry will get at least 4 electoral votes from Colorado, and he may get 5. The state's net effect either way will be only +1 or -1, so there would be no incentive to move any resources there (other than to perhaps help Salazar beat the King of Bad Beer).

By the way, as a law student very interested in constitutional law, I don't see that any challenge to the amendment - should it pass - would be successful either way. Then again, the Court could simply apply the Equal Protection Clause to an absurd level like it did in Bush v. Gore (which practically speaking, every lawyer knows was results-based jurisprudence; the per curium opinion is absurd).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beyurslf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-04 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. Last I saw, the proposal was very close and seemed to be gaining
I am thinking it is going to pass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-04 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. Either way, if it passed, it would represent net gain of EV's for the Dems
from CO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
I Lean Left Donating Member (487 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-04 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Only if Kerry didn't win the Colorado popular vote
If that happens we will be moaning about not getting all 9.

I personally think it's bullshit to change the rules after the votes are cast. Rules should be in place before voting. Unfair to the campaigns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-04 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. No, it would still be a gain of EV's from 2000, even though it would
be a loss from what it COULD have been.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dolstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-04 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'll tell you exactly what happens if Colorado is apportioned
Edited on Mon Oct-18-04 11:55 PM by dolstein
If Kerry loses the Colorado popular vote but the referendum passes and Kerry's share of the states electoral votes puts him over the top, the referendum will be immediately challeneged by the Bush campaign, and the case will likely be appealed to the Supreme Court.

If Kerry wins the Colorado popular vote but the referendum passes and Bush's share of the state's electoral vote puts him over the top, the referendum will be immediately challeneged by the Kerry campaign, and the case will likely be appealed to the Supreme Court.

I suspect that the Supreme Court would be likely to intervene if the lower court ruling goes against Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-04 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
7. Just vote for it.
It's EXTREMELY important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC