The obvious contenders are Ohio, Nevada, and Florida. I think we're out of the woods with Pennsylvania, but a well-hyped Zarqawi capture could throw that into the mix, too. One poster said Oregon is safe, but weren't the numbers there always a bit close. I know I heard about some registration irregularities there, too. And of course isn't Iowa the home of BBV's fave Senator?
Using the map from
Electoral Vote.com, it looks like Bush has 220 votes without those six states.
I'm giving New Mexico to Bush since it's looking a lot like Nader is gonna throw it to Bush this time. Toss in Iowa and Nevada (Nevada's always been a long shot anyhoo) and that brings Bush up to 232 (just 38 votes short of the finish line).
That means Bush needs to take
both Ohio (20) and Florida (27) to win (286-252). If he loses either of those two Kerry wins--272 if Kerry takes Ohio, 279 if Kerry takes Florida. If Kerry wins either one of these two big swinger, Bush can only only win if he gets a victory in either Wisconsin and Minnesota. That would be 276 votes for Bush (but that only works if you assume Bush also wins Iowa). Polls have been showing Wisconsin closer, but Minnesota still has the most unpredictable voters and worries me more.
If Bush loses Ohio and Iowa, but wins Florida and only one of either Minnesota and Wisconsin, then that gives him a total of 269--a tie, which will go to Bush because of the make up of the House of Representatives. What would be weird is that if the Democrats take control of the Senate and the EC tie allows the House to choose Bush, we could have a very intriguing four years of a Bush-Edwards administration.
But a more welcomer travesty of democracy would be if Bush somehow won the popular vote and Kerry still won in the Electoral College. Then the situation-ethics-inclined conservatives would suddenly want to join us in getting rid of that stoopid anachronism. They'd still be helpless to stop a Kerry administration from saving the world, however, and that's what I really want.