Zarqawi despite THREE elaborately-planned chances disappears two weeks before Election Day.
I realize news stories published on the web don't stay there forever. But isn't it suspicious that a key story about abysmal White House counterterrorism failures in Iraq could stay up for seven full months, and then suddenly disappear two weeks before Election Day?
Try this Google search, for "Miklaszewski" and "Zarqawi":
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=Miklaszewski+Zarqawi&btnG=Search .
The first "hit" now gives an error message. But it was posted on March 2 2004, and it. worked as recently as two weeks ago.
Here is the beginning of the now-deleted story:
From
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4431601 /
'MSNBC - Avoiding attacking suspected terrorist mastermind: Abu Musab Zarqawi blamed for more than 700 killings in Iraq
By Jim Miklaszewski, Correspondent, NBC News. Updated: 7:14 p.m. ET March 2, 2004
Abu Musab Zarqawi, a Jordanian militant with ties to al-Qaida, is now blamed for more than 700 terrorist killings in Iraq. But NBC News has learned that long before the war the Bush administration had several chances to wipe out his terrorist operation and perhaps kill Zarqawi himself, but never pulled the trigger....
More snippets of the original story and links to other pages that cite it are archived in a DU thread from the first of this month, at
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x939354------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note that another hit on the above Google search is a July item by Bob Novak that quotes Miklaszewski as still sticking by his story:
From
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/07/01/iraq/"On March 2, terrorist attacks brought the death toll attributed to Zarqawi to over 700. Jim Miklaszewski, the longtime Pentagon correspondent for NBC, reported multiple U.S. chances to "wipe out" Zarqawi and his bioweapons lab. The chances were missed, according to unnamed "military officials," because "the administration feared destroying the terrorist camp in Iraq would undercut the case against Saddam."
<SNIP>
Jim Miklaszewski told me he stands by his story, and pointed to House Armed Services Committee hearings April 21. Congressman Snyder brought the NBC story up to retired Gen. John Keane, and asked why the attack was rejected. "I don't know," the former Army acting chief of staff replied. "We looked at it the weekend of the Fourth of July the summer before we went into Iraq.""