|
And ya know, it's really not much of a problem. Not within the military. It's the civilians in the RW who are trying to make a problem out of it. Chickenhawks, for the most part, and a smattering of old veterans who didn't serve with women, or if they did, only knew members of the WAC and WAAC who weren't even allowed to carry rifles or wear field uniforms.
I joined Army ROTC in 1973, entered active duty in '77, so I know something of the transition. And I retired in '97, so I'm not totally out of touch with the way things are now. Mostly I can only speak to the Army, altho my last couple of assignments were in joint commands, so I'm not totally clueless about the other services.
But I think the Army is mostly what you're talking about, right? I will offer these opinions first on the other services: The Navy has its problems with women, to some extent because they tend to be extremely tradition-bound, some because the prohibitions against women on ships has only fairly recently been lifted. The Marines tend to be like Army infantry units, and women are not really utilized fully and have not come into their own. I never saw first-hand any problem at all in the Air Force, except that they tend to treat anyone who is not a fighter pilot like dirt, so that includes the women.
As for the Army, there have been official studies on the issue, and "most" military men only care that the people working beside them be competent and capable, and "most" think that military women are getting the job done just fine.
About the only place within the military where you find a significant level of doubt about the abilities of female soldiers is in units where there are no women. Infantry, armor, and such. Because they don't know many women in uniform, they buy into the stereotype. And because the guys who sign up for the combat arms are likely to be more conservative when they join. Even then, the old attitudes mostly exist among the enlisted men. Officers generally know better.
Army-wide, there are some misgivings about women being assigned to some types of combat units, but not sent into combat in general. And you find that among men and women. On the whole, enlisted women do not want to serve in combat (but that is true for enlisted men as well, except for the ones who signed up for it... and even them after they've seen the elephant). Female officers, otoh, generally want to be treated, judged, and assigned based on their individual abilities, whether they WANT to be sent into combat or not. They are every bit as professional as the men.
As for the original Savage assertion, remember that the unit which refused the mission was NOT a combat unit. It was transportation. Not generally designed to deploy to the forward combat area. Which is one reason the vehicles are not armor-protected and the unit not equipped with the highest tech weaponry and personal protective gear.
But Iraq is an insurgency, and there is no forward area. That's just a plain fact. Women in support units are in combat, whether they want to be, or ever thought they would be. Some are probably not dealing with it well, but I would submit, especially among reservists, that's true for the men as well. It's not at all what they expected when they signed on. But I would also submit the bigger problem is with the leadership of the reserve units, which is sub-par in a lot of cases.
Guys like Savage, and your civilian friends, can rant and rave all they want about what a big "problem" women in the military is. But the other simple fact is, the military can NOT function without us. Not without a draft (you know, the one Bush promised us we wouldn't have--hahahaha...).
And even with a draft, getting rid of the women isn't feasible either. There are just too many specialties that women, especially young women just out high school, excell far above their male counterparts (in the aggregate). I remember when the Reagan administration tried to roll back a lot of the progress we'd made in the Ford and Carter years and they found out it was just not an option. Military leadership, officer and NCO, has in fact learned to deal with that fact, no matter what they might think. The junior enlisted figure it out as they mature.
|