Another potential nail in Bush's coffin - CIA director blocks 9-11 Report

[tomfodw]

His hand-picked partisan hack CIA director is illegally sitting on the 9-11 report.

The 9/11 Secret in the CIA's Back Pocket

By Robert Scheer
The Los Angeles Times

It is shocking: The Bush administration is suppressing a CIA report on 9/11 until after the election, and this one names names. Although the report by the inspector general's office of the CIA was completed in June, it has not been made available to the congressional intelligence committees that mandated the study almost two years ago.

"It is infuriating that a report which shows that high-level people were not doing their jobs in a satisfactory manner before 9/11 is being suppressed," an intelligence official who has read the report told me, adding that "the report is potentially very embarrassing for the administration, because it makes it look like they weren't interested in terrorism before 9/11, or in holding people in the government responsible afterward."

When I asked about the report, Rep. Jane Harman (D-Venice), ranking Democratic member of the House Intelligence Committee, said she and committee Chairman Peter Hoekstra (R-Mich.) sent a letter 14 days ago asking for it to be delivered. "We believe that the CIA has been told not to distribute the report," she said. "We are very concerned."

According to the intelligence official, who spoke to me on condition of anonymity, release of the report, which represents an exhaustive 17-month investigation by an 11-member team within the agency, has been "stalled." First by acting CIA Director John McLaughlin and now by Porter J. Goss, the former Republican House member (and chairman of the Intelligence Committee) who recently was appointed CIA chief by President Bush.

The official stressed that the report was more blunt and more specific than the earlier bipartisan reports produced by the Bush-appointed Sept. 11 commission and Congress. "What all the other reports on 9/11 did not do is point the finger at individuals, and give the how and what of their responsibility. This report does that," said the intelligence official. "The report found very senior-level officials responsible."

By law, the only legitimate reason the CIA director has for holding back such a report is national security. Yet neither Goss nor McLaughlin has invoked national security as an explanation for not delivering the report to Congress. "It surely does not involve issues of national security," said the intelligence official.

"The agency directorate is basically sitting on the report until after the election," the official continued. "No previous director of CIA has ever tried to stop the inspector general from releasing a report to the Congress, in this case a report requested by Congress."

Think the press will pick up on this? If they do, Bush could be in serious trouble.

[Hog lover]

1. What, they didn't blame Clinton?

Could they have found that Bushco ignored plain warnings? Egad!

[daa]

2. The October surprise

will be a CIA leak of this incriminating shrub. Byb bye Chimpy. Like JFK said, don't fuck with the CIA.

[Not Me]

3. It'll get out in the next two weeks

n/t

[tomfodw]

4. The Busheviks are probably trying to create a fake version...

...that is favorable to the Chimp. So they can leak it to Novak or some other stooge. Or maybe a fake version they can leak to this month's Rather and then triumphantly reveal it's a forgery.