Why has Bush skipped Ohio? "His numbers go down when he's there."

[BurtWorm]

According to Sidney Blumenthal:


http://www.salon.com/opinion/blumenthal/2004/10/20/election/print.html

The polls, nearly all showing a dead-even race, are fundamentally flawed in that they mostly fail to account for all these new voters, who have no past records. Also, they do not measure those for whom a cellphone is their principal phone -- 6 percent of the population now, concentrated among younger people, who appear to show an unusual interest in voting and will vote Democratic by a margin of 2.5-to-1.

The Democracy Corps poll, however, accounts for newly registered voters. Stanley Greenberg, Bill Clinton's pollster in his 1992 campaign and Tony Blair's, conducts the poll's research. Four months ago, Greenberg told me, the newly registered made up only 1 percent of the sample. One month ago, they comprised 4 percent. Now, in the poll completed on Oct. 18, they are at 7 percent and rising. And they will vote for Kerry over Bush by 61 to 37 percent.

Moreover, Bush's job approval has now fallen to 47 in this poll (others have it at 44); presidents below 50 lose without exception. Bush has not campaigned in Ohio for an extraordinary stretch of three weeks, though he plans to stop there once this week. Unemployment continues to rise in the state. "There is no other explanation for his absence," says Greenberg, "other than his numbers go down when he's there. His position on jobs is implausible."

[BurtWorm]

1. kick

[Sannum]

2. LOL

His numbers go up when he is not around, lol. They like him better away from the state:)

[donkeyotay]

3. made my day

"There is no other explanation for his absence," says Greenberg, "other than his numbers go down when he's there. His position on jobs is implausible."


:)

[robbedvoter]

4. Ha!ha! conceded Pa and Ohio!