Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Beware of electronic voting machines, Words of warning from a programmer

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
AnIndependentTexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-04 04:16 PM
Original message
Beware of electronic voting machines, Words of warning from a programmer
posted by VCambri, at Today, 12:04 PM on Kerry/Edwards forum
http://forum.johnkerry.com/index.php?showtopic=99216&hl=

As a Software Architect with 18 years experience and an Adjunct Professor of Computer Science I want to warn the Kerry campaign that a determined operative can commit fraud with electronic voting machines, even if there is a software based verification regime and ironclad security. All that will be needed to cheat the system is knowledge of the methods used to detect cheating.

My suggestions for the campaign would be these:

1. All data collected by the voting machines must be stored locally on each machine as well as transmitted to the server. All electronic voting machines must be quarantined after election day. They may not be connected to any kind of modem and they must be turned off immediately after the last person votes.

2. The exact compiled software, the source code, and the software architecture used for data assimilation must be provided to the campaigns before the election and the campaigns should have the right to visit any computer used in the vote and view the contents of the harddrive and RAM before election day, during election day, and after election day.

3. If it is not too late to organize this, I would propose an image recognition based verification system that would be installed in random voting booths. I suggest simple computers with small, simple cameras that image the monitor and record the result of the vote by video-recording and processing the confirmation page. Since this would provide a result that is completele independent from the processor of the voting machine itself, it would yield, at least for that particular machine, an independent record of the vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-04 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. God, I am so concerned about computer hacking that leaves no trace!
These people will stop at nothing to win this election. Kerry Campaign, please take notice!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salvorhardin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-04 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. You have to ask yourself
If a system so complicated is needed just to be sure votes are recorded accurately, then perhaps the old system wasn't so bad?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyingfysh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-04 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. another programmer opinion here
A great deal of work has gone to making banking transactions secure (there are very thick books available on how to do that), and in lots of ways voting is a harder problem.

The best solution is simply paper ballots. Not every problem requires a technical solution.

The only downside of paper ballots is that you have to wait a little longer for results. But to ensure a fair election, it is worth it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-04 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Yeah, exactly. But people like the flashing lights. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sherilocks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-04 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. They will not let you look at the source code in Florida.
I've tried. A programmer friend of mine, unfortunately not a COBOL programmer, and now deceased, was allowed a quick glimpse in 1980 in Broward County. I still have his notes somewhere. His conclusion was that there was the original source code, and then additional code added to it at a different time. But before he could examine it further, he was led away when they saw him taking notes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blaze Diem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-04 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. A few months ago, someone posted that the problem would not be the code,
but, rather the operating system itself.
I believe the person posting this was from Seattle.
I regret not having any info on his post, since it was quite well researched and explained his findings in great detail.

I fear this election has already been decided by Diebold..recalling the memo from Diebold assuring Bush that they have done everything possible to insure his victory..

I'll look for the link to this also..from a past posting.

I hope the Lord has plans for the salvation of our American Democracy.
Evil rules in the halls of the Bush regime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasSissy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-04 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. Machines cannot be quarantined during early voting, which
goes on for 2 weeks in Texas. ????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Awsi Dooger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-04 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
7. I noticed New Mexico is predominantly electronic machines now
That is seldom mentioned on DU, with all the concern about Florida and Ohio. MSNBC showed a national map broken down by the types of voting methods. Nearly 1/3 of the nation's voters now use electronic methods.

I'm not usually a cynic, but became alarmed at the potential fraud when an elections official said their goal was to make the machinery as reliable as Nevada slot machines. What a fucking worst case scenario horror. I have lived in Las Vegas since the '80s and have known sportsbook regulars who have made a living from flawed slot machines, literally hundreds of thousands of dollars profit.

I always wondered how they could be broke one day and make a $500 bet the next. Long after the fact they will laugh like hell and detail little glitches, like punching an obscure button sequence that makes the machine pay off when it should not.

If it's a machine it's potentially flawed or rigged, or both.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC