Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT Frank Rich on fire! "The O'Reilly Factor for Lesbians"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-04 05:51 AM
Original message
NYT Frank Rich on fire! "The O'Reilly Factor for Lesbians"
FRANK RICH
The O'Reilly Factor for Lesbians

Published: October 24, 2004

"And guys, if you exploit a girl, it will come back to get you. That's called 'karma.' "
- Bill O'Reilly, "The O'Reilly Factor for Kids"


IN the annals of election year 2004, Oct. 13 will be remembered as the day it rained lesbians in red America. That was when we learned that Andrea Mackris, an associate producer on "The O'Reilly Factor," had filed her sexual harassment law suit, charging that her boss had an obsessive interest in vibrators, phone sex and, most persistently, erotic scenarios involving pairs of women. That night brought the final presidential debate, in which John Kerry's description of Mary Cheney as a lesbian so riled the Bush-Cheney campaign, not to mention the easily aghast Washington press corps, you'd have thought the vice president's daughter was accused of enlisting in a threesome with Bill O'Reilly.

What's followed ever since is an orgy of schadenfreude and hypocrisy almost entertaining enough to take your mind off Iraq (as the Bush-Cheney campaign hopes it will). It's the kind of three-ring circus that makes me love this country. Only in America could Mr. O'Reilly appear on "Live With Regis and Kelly" to plug his new moralistic children's advice book (sample dictum: "Healthy sex is a combination of sensible behavior and sincere affection") just as old and young alike were going online to search thesmokinggun.com for the lewd monologues attributed to him in Ms. Mackris's 22-page complaint. Everyone is now so busy matching Mr. O'Reilly's alleged after-hours oratory - none of which he or his lawyer immediately denied - with his past condemnations of Janet Jackson, Ludacris, wet T-shirt contests, Joycelyn Elders and the televised Madonna-Britney smooch that the findings could fill another Starr report. My own favorite example, hands down, is Mr. O'Reilly's reverie about hooking up with "hot" Italian women during a visit to the Vatican while his pregnant wife was marooned at home in Plandome, Long Island....

***

When Mrs. Cheney hyperbolically implies that even using the word lesbian in 2004 is a slur out of the McCarthy era - "a cheap and tawdry political trick," she said - she is playing a similar game. She is positioning lesbian as a term comparable to child molester. But as Dave Cullen writes in Salon: "It is not an insult to call a proudly public lesbian a lesbian. It's an insult to gasp when someone calls her a lesbian." Mrs. Cheney and her surrogates are in effect doing exactly what Elizabeth Edwards had the guts to say they were doing: they are sending the message to Mr. Rove's four million ("evangelicals and fundamentalists" who didn't show up on Election Day 2000, losing the popular vote, according to Rove) that they are ashamed of Mary Cheney. They are disowning her under the guise of "defending" her. They are exploiting her for the sake of political expediency even as they level that charge at Democrats....The Republican establishment is rife with gay people - just ask anyone in proximity to its convention in New York - and the campaign doesn't want the four million to know about them, either. But in this election season, actual outing has begun to creep onto the Internet, where the names of closeted Republican congressmen and aides who support anti-gay policies are a Google search away. Some named so far - one of whom dropped out of his re-election campaign in August - hail from districts where some of those four million live.

Sooner or later this untenable level of hypocrisy is going to lead to a civil war within the Republican party. But this hypocrisy is not just about homosexuality - it's about all sexuality, as befits a party that calls for the elimination of Roe v. Wade and the suppression of candid sex education that might prevent teenage pregnancy and AIDS alike. Should Bill O'Reilly-Andrea Mackris tapes exist, as many believe they do, we will learn graphically where the right's most popular cultural defender of G-rated values stands not only on lesbianism but also on extramarital sex, sexual tourism in Asia and masturbation -which all figure in the complainant's detailed description of her alleged conversations with her boss. But anyone who fears that Mr. O'Reilly has completely abandoned his political faith need not worry. According to Ms. Mackris's account, the one time this would-be Lothario succeeded in luring her to his hotel room alone it was not by offering to show her his etchings, or even Spectravision, but a televised news conference by President Bush.


http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/24/arts/24rich.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
vickie Donating Member (663 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-04 06:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. Way to go Frank!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TaleWgnDg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-04 06:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. yada yada yada . . . same old same old dirty tricks . . .
and I am beginning to wonder if O'Reilly didn't set-up this so-called sex harassment lawsuit! Seriously. What better publicity for the tawdry, coarse and vile O'Reilly?

And as for the Cheneys? Geezuz. It's tough taking their hypocritical rantings seriously. Although seriously they must be attacked by Kerry and Company. Sad, really.


. . . . . . . . . .



.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jivenwail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-04 06:07 AM
Response to Original message
3. Awesome! Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichaelHarris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-04 06:08 AM
Response to Original message
4. I would love
to be a fly on the wall at fox right now. My guess is any day day now Oreilly's head will explode and loofahs will be splattered on the wall.

I'll personally donate 100 bucks to anyone who can sneak in and put a loofah on Oreilly's desk and take pictures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-04 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. LOL! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texasmom Donating Member (490 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-04 06:13 AM
Response to Original message
5. I had no idea that Frank Rich
was this fair.
Great article!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-04 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. NYT made a mistake when they kicked Rich off the op-ed page --
he's a terrific writer. Interestingly, he was the Times's (very powerful) theater critic before going on to a regular column on the op-ed page. Now, he writes pieces like this one, in the Arts Section.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texasmom Donating Member (490 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-04 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. Well, I'm very grateful for him
and his column today. I have no idea who I'm confusing him with, but I'm glad he's consistent and fair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-04 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #5
17. Mr. Rich Is An Excellent Fellow, Ma'am
"LET'S GO GET THOSE BUSH BASTARDS!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texasmom Donating Member (490 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-04 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. I've obviously confused him with someone else.
Sorry for the mistake, Mr. Rich, if you're reading.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-04 06:18 AM
Response to Original message
6. excellent commentary, as always
The nub of the issue:

"It is not an insult to call a proudly public lesbian a lesbian. It's an insult to gasp when someone calls her a lesbian."

The Repugs are so tangled up in their hypocrisy, they're bound to trip over it someday. Tho I suppose they expect that if they win, they will be able to take us all back to the mythical wonder years of the 50s, where sexuality didn't exist and it was perfectly all right to hate people who were different...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-04 06:21 AM
Response to Original message
7. To good not to read.
Those Republicans seem to do all those things we Dem. do also. Funny how the GOP like to get into our bed rooms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-04 06:28 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carl Yasutomo Donating Member (153 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-04 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
11. Why the hell is his column in the "Arts" section and not Op-Ed?
Frank Rich is one of my favorite columnists, and I've never understood why they moved him to the Arts section.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-04 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Especially when David Brooks is given space on the op-ed page!
I don't understand it either, CY -- and a big welcome to DU to you --
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carl Yasutomo Donating Member (153 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-04 08:02 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. David Brooks - don't remind me
Thanks for the welcome, DeepModem Mom!

I have hated David Brooks ever since the primary season when he was pushing the line that Howard Dean supporters are just a bunch of wild-eyed, crazy, vicious "Bush haters" who should calm down and behave themselves. (Like the lunatics who pushed all the phony Clinton "scandals" for eight years and wasted $70 million of taxpayer money investigating Clinton's sex life are a model of level-headed rationality.)

I actually did not support Dean before that David Brooks column, but that column (along with all the other media people including liberals like Nicholas Kristof scolding the Bush-haters) made me so angry I became a Deaniac and contributed to his campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-04 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. Hi Carl Yasutomo!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-04 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. He's kind of Critic At Large - he's the cultural critic
And politics is culture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-04 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
16. Love this part
"Sooner or later this untenable level of hypocrisy is going to lead to a civil war within the Republican party."

And won't that be a happy day!!!
Almost as good as the Red Sox winning the Series.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chiburb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-04 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
18. Beautiful! Thanks for posting this. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC