DemocratSinceBirth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-21-04 05:46 PM
Original message |
Hey NBC-Mason Dixon Blew Delaware In 00 By Seventeen Points... |
|
Gimme a fu--ing break....
|
dave123williams
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-21-04 05:48 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Right; Quinnipeac/Marist Institute blew NY elections by 17 when |
|
Hillary ran against Lazio; funny how there's no stories about how full of shit most polling is...
|
DemocratSinceBirth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-21-04 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. I'd Like To See When The Poll Was Taken To Be Fair... |
|
The Mason Dixon poll was close to the election..
It's hard to blow a prediction by seventeen percentage points...
|
dave123williams
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-21-04 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. The one in NY was the day before the election... |
|
The biggest drubbing in NY State electoral politics history, and the pollsters were, um, off the mark.
|
DemocratSinceBirth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-21-04 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. I'd Like To See A Link |
|
because I followed the polls and I never thought HRC would lose...
|
dave123williams
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-21-04 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. I didn't think that she'd lose either, but I do remember that poll... |
|
Let me see if I can find it in a google search, or something...
|
dave123williams
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-21-04 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
Looks like they had it 49/44, with 7% undecided the evening before the vote. Plus or minus 3%, I think. She won by 17. http://www.maristpoll.marist.edu/nyspolls/000912hc.htm
|
DemocratSinceBirth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-21-04 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. That Was A Couple Months Out... |
|
The poll I cited was less than ten days out...
It's a small point....
No biggy...
|
dave123williams
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-21-04 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
12. Yeah; I just noticed that... |
|
I was digging a little and noticed that they removed the link to the one I was thinking of, the day before the election. Wonder why?
|
ISUGRADIA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-22-04 02:43 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
16. Their 11-1 poll had Clinton ahead 49-43 |
|
http://www.maristpoll.marist.edu/nyspolls/001029hc.htm The actual result was Clinton 55% (+6) and Lazio 44% (+1) an 11 point spread.
I can't really fault their results. There was no margain of error listed but say it's three percent, the 11-1 poll was close to the final result if one adjusts accordingly.
|
Awsi Dooger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-21-04 06:23 PM
Response to Original message |
7. You don't have to retreat that far to condemn Mason Dixon |
|
Try November, 2002.
BURLINGTON — The latest independent poltical poll published Sunday indicated Democrat Douglas Racine had opened a 10-point lead over Republican James Douglas in the race for Vermont governor. The statewide poll for The Burlington Free Press of 625 likely voters gave Racine 46 percent, Douglas 36 percent and independent Con Hogan 9 percent. The poll, conducted Wednesday through Friday by Mason-Dixon Polling & Research Inc. of Washington, D.C., has a margin of error of 4 percentage points. That means there is believed to be a 95 percent certainty that Douglas’ actual support is in the 32 to 40 percent range, with Racine’s ranging from 42 to 50 percent."
That was Mason Dixon's final poll, conducted Oct. 30-Nov. 1, 2002. Actual result? Douglas 44.9%, Racine 42.4%. So much for 95% certainty.
|
DemocratSinceBirth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-21-04 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
10. How Do Credible Pollsters Make Such Errors? |
Awsi Dooger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-21-04 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
14. I've read that polls in less populus states are notiously unreliable |
|
They are lesser in number, not a priority and underfunded. Supposedly the demographic sample is imprecise, and therefore the margin of error is dramatically understated. Pollsters invariably attach the same MOE to polls.
I had a link for the article regarding polls in small populus states, but when I pasted it here and checked the link, the website is no longer there.
|
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-21-04 06:25 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
nodictators
(977 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-21-04 06:41 PM
Response to Original message |
11. Russert and Brokaw were all smiles tonight re new poll |
|
Was that the Mason-Dixon poll on NBC Nightly "News" tonight?
Anyhow, Russert had Bush very strong in the battleground states. That is contrary to other polls.
Even more telling is the fact that Bush has now gone to Pennsylvania 40 times. Doesn't seem like he'd have done that if he were doing well there.
Also, Bush hasn't been in Ohio for a while. It isn't because he's got it locked up.
Looks like GO for Kerry-Edwards!
|
elperromagico
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-22-04 02:46 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
17. I heard El Arbusto hasn't gone to Ohio |
|
because his polls numbers drop whenever he goes there. *hehehe*
|
Euphen
(209 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-21-04 06:52 PM
Response to Original message |
13. What were the actual numbers for that poll? n/t |
DemocratSinceBirth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-21-04 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
|
www.emergingdemocraticmajorityweblog.com
look in the October archives...
|
sonicx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-22-04 04:12 AM
Response to Original message |
18. if you look at Google news... |
|
the group of Mason Dixon polls are being picked up by a lot of sites.
Their IA result makes the least sense. Dems crushed GOP in voter registration.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:47 AM
Response to Original message |