Written in 1989.
"...And why? Because the German working class, in Reich's view, was starved of “orgastic” release and unconsciously yearned for the figure—Hitler—who promised them such release...
The German people did fall for Hitler just as the American people a half century later fell for Reagan. I mean, emotionally fell, as in falling in love. And while a simple orgasm theory certainly fails to account for the emotional appeal of fascism, Reich's theory was in fact anything but simpleminded. We don't have to go into it here, but Reich was trying to say that psychoanalysis should be taken even more seriously than Freud was willing to take it. Retch was holding, essentially, that human history included a drive for what might be called “deep transformative experiences,” that these involve the whole organism, mind and body, and come from the unconscious and can't be understood in ordinary political/economic terms...
This is a well-worn and disastrous path. For however those desires are mobilized, whether by Hitler, Reagan, Oliver North, Lyndon LaRouche, or the New Alliance Party, the result is sectarian and authoritarian. Projected desire of this kind cannot be creatively transformed; it has no recourse but to find an enemy, and no pathway but domination. It charges a politics of hate, and whether against the Father or the siblings is of little matter. At this level, all positions become objectively reactionary..."
http://www.ex-iwp.org/docs/1989/politics_of_therapy_89.htm