Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NY Times blatantly pandering to Bush voters

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
JPJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-04 09:16 PM
Original message
NY Times blatantly pandering to Bush voters
Edited on Thu Oct-21-04 09:20 PM by JPJones
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/21/science/21gene.html

"At the time of its first report, the consortium that decoded the human genome had failed to close 147,821 gaps in the DNA sequence of the 24 pairs of human chromosomes. These gaps, stretches of DNA resistant to the usual sequencing methods, have now been reduced to just 341. The total size of the human genome is 3.08 billion units of DNA, the consortium now estimates. Besides the 341 gaps, a special structural DNA at the center and tips of each chromosome continues to defy current sequencing."

Or as Maureen Dowd has said:
Dowd: Because Karl Rove thinks that if the Bush White House gets four million more evangelical votes than they did last time it ensures Bush's re-election, which means he's not his dad. And so they've dragged poor Laura Bush out to go for this, what Lee Atwater used to call the extra-chromosome conservatives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
noahmijo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-04 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. They endorsed Kerry (The NY Times)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Jacobin Donating Member (820 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-04 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. what?
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JPJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-04 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. OK, I'll fill you in
We have 23 pairs of chromosomes. But if it's in the New York Times, it must be true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC