Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

There may indeed be a 3% "hidden vote" for Kerry

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 12:51 PM
Original message
There may indeed be a 3% "hidden vote" for Kerry
Nobody here is really talking about the Sid Blumenthal article in yesterday's Guardian, but I found this on kos:

Primary Cell Phone Users:
According to Blumenthal, these folks make up 6% of the population. They also split 70% to 30% for Kerry. In an otherwise tied race, the inclusion of cell users would create a 2.5% advantage for Kerry (.7 times .06, minus .3 times .06).
Newly Registered Voters:
According to Blumenthal, newly registered voters make up 7% of the electorate at this time. They split approximately 60% to 40% for Kerry. In an otherwise tied race, the inclusion of newly registered voters would create a 1.5% advantage for Kerry.

Now, these two populations overlap, and its impossible to say for sure how much so. However, we know that all major polls do not include primary cell users, so adjusting for them makes sense (give Kerry an additional 2.5% lead). Adding in a small boost for newly registered Kerry voters who are not primary cell users (maybe 0.5%) would make sense - don't forget that polling, like all statistics and sampling, is an imprecise artform and not an exact science. So next time you see a poll, give Kerry an additional 3-point lead by adding 1.5 to Kerry and taking 1.5 from Bush. Feel better? Do this in Ohio and Florida and feel even better!

http://www.dailykos.com/comments/2004/10/22/8914/8720/261#261


BTW The article was posted and linked here at DU on LBN and Editorials.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JuniorPlankton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's all speculation
The estimates vary. Nobody really knows how many of these people out there. Nobody knows how they vote, and, most importantly, IF they vote.

My own brother, a 26 year old grad student is one of them. He wasn't registered to vote until I made him (in Maine, so it is important)

Overall, I think it's a reserve for Kerry, but I can't quantify it.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amber dog democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. You'd think so. Maybe it is
but I was distressed yesterday evening after helping a woman I know with moving a heavy piece of furniture. Over dinner she confessed she missed the deadline to register to vote back in September and is miffed over why there have to be so many rules about voter registration. She WOULD have voted for Kerry.

This person is a therapist. Go figure. Fortinately I think she is in a small minority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
serryjw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. You are forgetting........
5% of america still does not have a phone! I know several that don't...they can't afford the deposit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Southpaw Bookworm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. And don't forget cell phones
I know several people who don't have a land line, all under-35 lefties, and use their cell as their primary number. Cell numbers aren't used for the polls. I think this is a substantive bit of Kerry supporters whose thoughts aren't being recorded by the pollsters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. His new voter estimate sounds low
At least half a dozen groups have been registering new voters. Millions have been registered in swing states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. Here's hoping they get to the polls
and their votes are counted....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
7. sorry, don't believe it
Remember, just before the Iowa caucus, Howard Dean suddenly dropped in the poll. His spinners - pre caucus - claimed that the pollsters didn't count all those young, newly registered Deaniacs because they all used cell phones.

And, how did that caucus turn out for Dr. Dean?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Well, it might explain Dean's "bouncing" back
He was polling around 12% and I believe he got "back" up to around 18% in the actual caucus. So maybe he had around 15% or so before and they never knew it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. How many are there in Iowa anyway?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tcfrogs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Hey, no ripping on Iowa
I'm a native, and must stand up for my state.

Plenty of cell phones there, at least in the Des Moines area. Seemed just like Chicago to me, cell phone-wise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. No...I wasn't ripping.
I'm just saying, Iowa is not that populous and how many youth are there that would be more likely to be totally wireless?

You'll much more in Florida, NY, OH, PA, etc. Esp. the inner-city folks where pre-pay cell phones are very popular.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tcfrogs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. It's about 3 mil, with a dwindling rural population
Percentage wise, I'd guess Iowa would rank right near the middle or slightly below for cell phone usage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Iowa has a lot of colleges
must be a good 100,000 students there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petersjo Donating Member (192 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. We're really quite modern here...
Only get the horse and buggy out a couple times a year. No Iowa bashing please!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petersjo Donating Member (192 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #10
21. We're really quite modern here...
Only get the horse and buggy out a couple times a year. No Iowa bashing please!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. And the undecideds are about 5-7%
All Kerry needs is 60% of them and that's enough to tip the balance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tcfrogs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
12. Um, Sid Blumenthal is not exactly non-partisan
Just pointing it out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemFromMem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
15. Don't forget the immigrants
They often escew pollsters due to language barriers and a mistrust of people who ask personal political questions. They break 2 to 1 for Democrats. And there are more than three million new citizens sworn in since the last election. That equates to a potential extra million votes for Kerry this go around. New citizens also tend to be more interested in voting than the general populous (possibly because they've don't take their new status for granted).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. You remind me of the Cuban vote shift to Kerry
due to the travel bans by Bush. Chalk that up as a "hidden" Kerry vote in Florida.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemFromMem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Mexicans are the main group to watch
You're right about the Cubans and that's great news. They're breaking about 2 to 1 for Bush this year, but that's far better than the 10 to 1 when I was growing up in Miami.

Mexicans are now well represented in every state in the country. Here in Tennessee, we have 600,000, nearly 10% of the state's population. Arkansas has a major population as well. People are surprised when they find out how large the Latino populations are in places outside of the Southwest and West.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n2mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
19. 3%? Not....
I truly believe there is a Kerry underground
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BillZBubb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
20. I've seen Repug talking heads admit they need a 4% poll lead
going into an election or the Democratic turnout will beat them. They know the polls are skewed to them, but they don't like to admit it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuaneBidoux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
23. But the BIG QUESTION: Will they vote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC